Swivelinglight
Permabanned
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2010
- Messages
- 1,070
I will leave a legacy of reasonable financial support.
Hunger Games I Volunteer As Tribute GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY
I will leave a legacy of reasonable financial support.
I'm glad that people in the US is starting to take this seriously. Might be too late, but better now than later.
Um....I have taken it seriously from the beginningI'm glad that people in the US is starting to take this seriously. Might be too late, but better now than later.
Ok so I am am enneagram 6 preparing for catastrophe at all times. I am in a high risk group due to serious asthma and to a lesser extent due to age. Anyone want to take this over If meet my demise.
Send details via PM and let me know why you would be a good candidate. I will leave a legacy of reasonable financial support.
I know it is all very unlikely but best to be prepared![]()
Um....I have taken it seriously from the beginning
Trump signs $8.3B coronavirus spending bill: '''It’s an unforeseen problem''' | Fox News
Trump just signed an 8b$ bill to fight the Corona virus.
8 billion divided with the 320 million Americans should be 25$ per person. It will help but I am not sure this is a winning move.
Especially since the key is in attitude, not money.
![]()
The bill will fund the development of vaccines, medications to treat the disease and diagnostic tests all while helping state and local governments -- and foreign governments -- fight the coronavirus, which causes a disease officially known as COVID-19.
I don't think it's a per-person hand-out of the sort that you're suggesting. From the article:
Of course it isn't, but if we count in the potential problems that can come out of this 8 billion is pocket change. Plus who will pay the vaccine and treatment for the poor sick and uninsured, 25$ will not to it for sure. The bomb simply isn't diffused. He should have placed at least 80 million in this.
I'm sure there will be more funding as the problem continues to expand.
Anyway, the spending bill came out of Congress. Congress controls the budget, so it's pretty much on Congress to come up with the money as needed. The President basically just signs off on it.
Perhaps but American politics is full of people overriding each others decisions. In general I wouldn't say anything but American politics and especially GOP has the tendency to trivialize medical and scientific problems. Therefore the congress are not saints either.
The problem is that society as a hole has about 75 trillion in various debts and generally bad "blood picture". Therefore if this virus starts an avalanche there will be a real "shit hit the fan" country wide. Which will surely spill on global issues. Therefore if you have spent 8 trillion just on Iraq I think this is worth more money and effort than politicians in general are showing.
![]()
Whatever. Remember, the coronavirus hasn't really taken hold in the US yet. There really isn't anything to spend money on at this point, other than research and the needs of a few hot spots around the country. Once there's a need for big money, I'm sure they'll throw the necessary money at it.
Also, keep in mind that it's an election year. Trump's presidency is going to ride on how well the government responds to this crisis, so I expect he'll be more than happy to throw any amount of money at it to show he's on top of it. And Congress is pretty much in the same boat. (The entire House and 1/3 of the Senate is up for re-election.)
Ultimately, I don't think money is going to be an issue. Basically, the article is just saying: "We're on top of it, we're already throwing money at it." And there's no reason to think that they're going to stop the spending, especially in an election year.
Wrong, when it takes hold it will already be too late. Since that means that the economy will be severely disturbed for sure.
There is plenty to do, research, preparing quarantines, testing suspicious people, trying to prevent global spread of the virus through WHO and similar initiatives. Now and through past month it is the time to fight this. Once you have 200 000 infected living their lives around the country it is basically too late. This is exactly why treatment in USA is so expensive since you approach it in reactive way rather than preventive. Maybe you will get lucky with all of this but that isn't really the strategic approach.
I'm not saying that the size of the package is ideal. Sure, one can take a cynical approach and insist that it's not enough, no matter how big they make the package. For the cynics, no amount is ever going to be enough.
But Congress has put its heads together and come up with this package for now. And it's an election year, and I'm quite sure there will be more forthcoming later as the need increases. It is what it is. I don't imagine that Congress is deliberately plotting to kill off American citizens through stinginess.
Exactly. I took a hot bath and listened to some Kenny G so I should he good. If I feel like things are getting dire, I'll eat an orange.
Yeah, but only until you add other viruses.It is almost dark humor how on every map of the global infection Africa is clear "winner" in containing this.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, but only until you add other viruses.![]()
The point behind sarcasm was that down there probably no one is even monitoring this.
There is no way that this bypassed Africa this much, especially due to strong economic connections to China.