I'm too sad for pants.
- Aug 25, 2009
- Instinctual Variant
^The clip from that video that shows Trump mocking Hillary is the approach I think is most effective publicly and it inspired me find that clip directly which I did. I'm going to post the following publicly. In this way no one can use what I say or do as fodder to justify what they do, even if the two scenarios are different. There is way too much "mom, he's doing it too!" mentality going on politically, which ends up being a downward spiral of competing wretchedness. Taking the high road publicly undercuts that. Quoting what comes directly from his mouth is most effective. What can people accuse the "Left" or "me" of doing if I don't do it at all, but show him doing it.
Edit: I am going to add that anyone who accuses me of being too soft on Trump will go permanently on my ignore list. I think he is an organized crime boss with demonstrated ties to confirmed child sex traffickers. I'm talking about something completely different in my approach.
It would take only one person with reason to want him dead to get their aunt Fran to spit ina cup before being hospitalized with COVID-19, buy a front row seat to a rally, set up a chance to shake his hand and nudge the viral dose along. It's not like other poisons or deadly viruses because it's everywhere. How could anyone be traced?
What about all the pictures of him hugging people? and shaking hands? All he needs to do is shake hands with someone wearing "special lotion".He's a notorious germaphobe though. I've heard that, even before the pandemic, he wasn't doing the hand-shaking shtick because of it. He even supposedly has contempt for "the unwashed masses" of people in public spaces. I don't know how true the latter two things are, but being a germaphobe is relatively well documented.
Just maybe a week ago I read a story - from that woman who was friends with Melania, and wrote a book about them - about how he won't even eat off a plate that someone has touched (it's obviously a bad idea if someone has touched the food, but she said that simply picking it up and touching the bottom/sides is enough for him to refuse it).
So it wouldn't be that easy. But I'm keeping my fingers crossed for exposure to a higher viral load.
What about all the pictures of him hugging people? and shaking hands? All he needs to do is shake hands with someone wearing "special lotion".
Despite coronavirus, Trump keeps shaking hands - ABC News
Edit: Also pictures of him kissing people and I know there are dozens of women who accuse him of grabbing their boobs, crotches and forcibly kissing them.
The women who accused him of grabbing and kissing were connected with the pageants. I don't know who he shakes hands with, but I think there are special featured citizens like the one in the previous post that a person could theoretically set up to Covid-bomb him. Also, someone rich or famous could have the motivation.Is it with people in the general public though, like at his rallies? It wouldn't surprise me if he were willing to shake hands with CEOs and/or other rich/powerful people, but I doubt anyone living a life that comfortable would see any point in risking losing that comfort for a chance to infect him. (And it's totally possible the claims about him being disgusted by regular people aren't substantial. I consistently hear about it, and it tracks with his character, but that doesn't mean it's true).
"Beautiful women" are likely exempt from the "unwashed masses" too. He's a revolting pig.
eta: Next time I see some mention of this behavior, I'll try to remember to cite it here. But I also vaguely remember a "source" from his campaign staff has said he makes a point of making sure all the people at his rallies stay a safe distance from him; it was a 'story' because of how hypocritical it is to discourage masks and for people to stay physically distant from each other while insisting on that precaution for himself.
The women who accused him of grabbing and kissing were connected with the pageants. I don't know who he shakes hands with, but I think there are special featured citizens like the one in the previous post that a person could theoretically set up to Covid-bomb him. Also, someone rich or famous could have the motivation.
My main point is that whatever environmental mechanisms are in place to enable unintentional transmission of COVID-19 to the president could in theory be used intentionally. This is what I mean that there are two levels to how he has made himself vulnerable. There are not environmental conditions in place now where he could accidentally be shot with a stray bullet. If there were, then it would be easier for that to be done intentionally. Does that help make my point? Typically to assassinate a president requires extreme calculation to create a new set of conditions to make him vulnerable in some slight way. Right now there are conditions existing readily to make him vulnerable, so it would be much easier to take him out.
IDK, the people who accused him and Epstein of rape likely feel invested. I think there are lot of people from different vantage point that would have enough investment to think about taking advantage of this environmental vulnerability. It's just something that occurred to me, but I'm not suggesting there is proof or anything. I'm mostly 'just saying'.
The Typhoid Mary analogy is actually a really, really good one.
It's because of his own abilities, of course. Didn't you know that he's the greatest man on earth?Here's a question about Trump's current state of health that includes a declaration of being immune to COVID-19. He was given the Regeneron antibody cocktail, REGN-COV2, which was identified in his blood soon after receiving the cocktail. I've been reading about it and this treatment is described as being most helpful for individuals who are not producing their own antibodies.
Regeneron's REGN-COV2 Antibody Cocktail Reduced Viral Levels and Improved Symptoms in Non-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
What should be determined medically is whether or not his own body started generating adequate antibodies. If he is testing negative and looks clear of the virus, is it because of the cocktail or because his body is fighting it off? I think this could be a key question relating to whether or not an individual has achieved immunity.
Edit: I would still not be so presumptuous about it. Infection can leave heart and vascular damage even after the virus stops replicating. It's hard to say how much we are being lied to about all of this.