Wow.
![]()
The research, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, ranked frisky situations based on how likely it is to catch coronavirus while in the act. Researchers recommend wearing a mask for the riskiest sexual scenario: sex with people other than those with whom one is quarantined.
If you have an out-of-house coronavirus crush, the study says, besides keeping your mask on, you should avoid kissing, any oral-to-anal act and anything else that involves semen or urine. Shower before and after, and clean the space with alcohol wipes or soap.
The study also mentions that having sex with people who are together in quarantine is safer, but there is still a risk. For instance, if one partner goes outside to run an errand and is exposed to the virus, they can transmit it to the other. Even if that person is ultimately an asymptomatic carrier, they can still infect the other.
The safest approach to sexual activity, according to the researchers, is not having any.
The U.S. government will buy 100% of the California-based pharmaceutical company’s production in July, 90% of output in August and September in a move that should provide enough Remdesivir to treat around 80,000 patients.
The deal between the U.S. government and Gilead means that low and middle-income countries can make their own generic version of Remdesivir, but European, and other, countries will be unable to buy, or produce it.
Remdesivir sells for $390 per vial, or $2,340 per course of treatment sparking a backlash from consumer groups over its pricing pointing to $70 million of U.S. taxpayers’ support for Gilead’s development of the drug.
A Swedish study here of 200 people found a strong T cell response in most individuals who had mild illness or no symptoms following coronavirus infection, regardless of whether they showed an antibody response. The finding suggests that coronavirus infection rates may be higher than what has been studied using antibody tests alone, the researchers said.
A study led by the La Jolla Institute detected T cells that reacted to SARS-CoV-2 in about half of stored blood samples collected between 2015 and 2018, suggesting that the immune system cells developed after previous infection with circulating common cold coronaviruses, and that they might help protect against the new virus.
I'm not asking for advice. I will continue to research. The issue of blood clotting to some degree is well established, but I will continue to study this and find out if that isn't accurate. Telling someone to stop researching a pandemic during a pandemic is bad advice.My personal advice is that you stop researching this endlessly, since by now the internet is probably full of unchecked info and conspiracies on both sides. We all know what we as citizens generally must do and therefore there is no need for this.
I'm not asking for advice. I will continue to research. The issue of blood clotting to some degree is well established, but I will continue to study this and find out if that isn't accurate. Telling someone to stop researching a pandemic during a pandemic is bad advice.
edit: I live where the numbers are climbing very fast. Your advice could get me killed. Viruses can also mutate so what is happening where I live could be different from where you live. Scientists are still learning more. There isn't a static knowledge base on COVID-19.
i have family with high level medical training and I am highly educated with a doctorate in the humanities. Your assumptions are disrespectful.Of course, but I am simply getting the impression that you are getting obsessed with this and you have no real medical training. Therefore until you are get into complex chemical equations you are just going through random subjective/simplistic opinions around the internet. Actually one of the recommendations of my local version of CDC is that the person shouldn't just focus on the pandemic since you will psychologically burn down. Caution, paying attention and common sense absolutely, however obsession over this probably wouldn't help you. But as you wish, I am just a messenger in the end.
Your assumptions are disrespectful.