Virtual ghost
Complex paradigm
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 22,108
I agree that it seems like that rapid vaccination would solve that problem, but then there's the ethical problem of consent. Also it's a bit risky, and maybe not justifiably so, to use an experimental vaccine on a large population for a virus with a 98% survival rate.
See the link above in my reply to RH. It appears from that data that Delta is heading down the path of avoiding the current vaccines.
The vaccines aren't experimental. They passed through the formal trials and there are ones that use older technologies. The vaccines aren't perfect but they aren't formally experimental, especially when the doses have have been given in the billions.
Also the vaccines still fairly well protect against delta if your general health isn't really bad. However the next mutation that will come out of Delta could easily spill the glass and then there is no real going back. We would have to start basically from scratch and economy probably can't wait that long. Plus the mutations will probably continue and good portion of the world can't organize proper lockdown (due to money, infrastructure or the mindset). Plus the idea that there is a 98% survival rate is misleading. That applies when the healthcare system is available physically and financially. Therefore when it isn't the death rate is closer to 10% if you have age structure and climate as most developed countries. Not to mention that real problem isn't even death but long covid and organ damage that really lowers the quality of your life. Since here "what doesn't kill me make me stronger" doesn't really stand.
Vaccines aren't 100% perfect but by ignoring them and all other measures you basically make sure that the whole thing is going off cliff (what is evidently more than "risky").