Virtual ghost
Complex paradigm
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 22,126
Wait, was it two weeks to slow the spread, or two years?![]()
Two weeks is the duration between the introduction of any change in behavior and the effects of that change becoming visible in the official infection numbers. So, in a perfect world, where everybody on the planet isolates completely and absolutely follows all the recommendations, where all work, all economic activity, even essentials were dropped, two weeks.
In a world where many act as if this doesn't apply to them, where there are regions where masks and distancing aren't even compulsory, who knows?
Things seem to go well in places that vaccinate a lot. Other places that still don't take this seriously have had considerable excess deaths (+18% deaths in the USA, IIRC and places like Brazil are a desaster) and likely will draw this out for the entire planet.
Delhi sought the EU's support on Tuesday for a short-term waiver of an intellectual property rights agreement to facilitate accessibility to COVID-related products.
The Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS) was drafted by the World Trade Organization (WTO) to regulate licensing of COVID-related components.
Amid a surge in new coronavirus variants, India and South Africa have recently pushed for the waiver, but wealthy countries have resisted the idea.
Delhi and Johannesburg have said the waiver could allow drugmakers in developing countries to start producing effective vaccines sooner.
Two weeks is the duration between the introduction of any change in behavior and the effects of that change becoming visible in the official infection numbers. So, in a perfect world, where everybody on the planet isolates completely and absolutely follows all the recommendations, where all work, all economic activity, even essentials were dropped, two weeks.
In a world where many act as if this doesn't apply to them, where there are regions where masks and distancing aren't even compulsory, who knows?
Things seem to go well in places that vaccinate a lot. Other places that still don't take this seriously have had considerable excess deaths (+18% deaths in the USA, IIRC and places like Brazil are a desaster) and likely will draw this out for the entire planet.
Plus the virus is doing all kinds of things: from blood cloths, severe and permanent lung damage, damage to various organs ... etc. Therefore if you don't take the vaccine that is far far away from playing it safe. Especially since there is enough sick people that you can encounter the virus just about everywhere. While in the big picture if the vaccine effort fails globally the global economy will collapse under 280 Trillion $ debt that should be the sum of all debt in world. The number is just too great that you can have easy fix that is equal across the world. I mean if just one part of the world falls apart completely that will cause serious chain reactions and create domino effect. Therefore if vaccination effort fails you can say goodbye to the life as you knew, since the whole system will go off the cliff (especially since most countries can't do a proper lockdown due to infrastructure, money, culture or whatever). However you can't have the system on life support for a decade. While letting the virus run rampant also visibly depresses consumer spending and crashes the healthcare system. What also results in things going off the cliff in hysteria. Therefore there is no real way out but vaccines in combination with other counter-measures.
This isn't pretty but that is how this works.
This is overstated. Most people range from asymptomatic to an annoying cold or flu. That economic doomsday scenario, if it were to happen, would be caused mostly be government (over)reaction.
What is your definition of vaccine effort failure?