Okay.
So I looked at the results from October 17, 18 and 19. I believe most of the test-takers in that period are from this forum.
Here's what I found ...
[Sorry the tables don't come across well. I tried spacing them, but that didn't work either.]
67 Test Takers in Total
[Not significant number for real statistics, but fun anyway.]
[Some people may have taken it more than once, but there is no way to be sure which ones, so they are all treated as individual test-takers.]
How well did they think the initial test result fit?
INITIAL RATING
Enneagram Jungian
perfectly 31% 28%
quite well 48% 40%
so-so 19% 21%
not so well 1% 7%
not at all 0% 3%
61% scored both Enneagram and Jungian types as
"perfectly" or "quite well", needing no further adjustments.
Others went on to answer more questions.
How well did they think the final type fit?
FINAL RATING
Enneagram Jungian
perfectly 31% 31%
quite well 54% 52%
so-so 15% 16%
not so well 0% 0%
not at all 0% 0%
[My goal is +80% answering "perfectly" or "quite well".]
Distribution of Enneagram Types
E-type 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
number 4 7 5 19 16 2 5 2 7
% of total 6.0% 10.4% 7.5% 28.4% 23.9% 3.0% 7.5% 3.0% 10.4%
highlander posted statistics for the forum members in 2012 as (in order by type):
6% 3% 5% 23% 27% 11% 12% 5% 10%
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/enneagram/58167-forum-statistics-enneagram-types.html
This seems fairly similar to the results above.
Some generalizations - just eyeballing it here:
5's picked a few types and took longer to narrow down their type,
and more than the other types rated their description as "so-so".
7's more consistently picked their type, narrowing choices
more quickly, and went on to like them, and 5 out of 5
rated it "perfectly".
9's picked more type descriptions, but were quite happy
with the resulting type.
More than half of 4's, 7's and 9's rated their description
as "perfectly" fitting them, while the others were more
likely to rate it as "quite well".
Distribution of Jungian Types
J-type ENTJ ENTP ENFJ ENFP ESTJ ESTP ESFJ ESFP
number 0 3 1 4 1 0 0 3
% of total 0.0% 4.5% 1.5% 6.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5%
J-type INTJ INTP INFJ INFP ISTJ ISTP ISFJ ISFP
number 7 12 9 16 3 2 3 3
% of total 10.4% 17.9% 13.4% 23.9% 4.5% 3.0% 4.5% 4.5%
At 44 out of 67, INxx's clearly out number all the rest.
xxxP's also number 43 out of the 67.
INxP's are 28 out of 67, or 42%
Some generalizations - just eyeballing it here:
Most results fit the overall patterns, though perhaps the INxx's picked more types initially and overall rated them "quite well" instead of "perfectly".
In terms of correlations with Enneagram and Jungian types, the ones that stand out above are 4/INFP&ISFP, 5/INTP, 7/ESFP, 9/INFJ. (Again with such a small pool of data, it's hard to pull out significant correlations.)
Correlations with Enneagram and Jungian Types
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ENTJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ENTP 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0
ENFJ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
ENFP 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
ESTJ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
ESTP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ESFJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ESFP 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
INTJ 1 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0
INTP 1 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0
INFJ 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 4
INFP 1 2 0 7 5 0 0 0 1
ISTJ 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
ISTP 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
ISFJ 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
ISFP 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0