Jaguar
Active member
- Joined
- May 5, 2007
- Messages
- 20,639
but that is even true to MBTI and Engramme
Since you just made that point, and I'm sitting here laughing, I guess we have to discuss the obvious, don't we?
We are in a forum that focuses on a theory which has been deemed "nonsense" so many times I don't think a person could count that high without exhaustion.
People actually use the theory to type everything from fictional TV characters, pets, and probably their penis if given the chance.
I'm not going to make any claims about the validity of astrology or any mechanism. That's not even why I am in this thread.
I am in this thread because I see a huge problem with hypocrisy.
I find it more than a bit hypocritical that anyone demand empirical evidence for astrological theory,
while not demanding the same level of empirical evidence for MBTI theory.
"Oh you are type XXXX, well then, your 7th function is Fe."
Worse yet are comments like, "You are projecting your shadow functions at me!"
As John McEnroe would say: You cannot be serious.