I don't know how to phrase my thoughts on your type without sounding possibly harsh. So sorry in advanced.
How old are you?
While some sources argue that a person's function stack is fluid and subject to shifts and changes, I do not subscribe to that. I think your dominant function is established by the time your first wave of puberty hits (8-12ish) and your auxiliary function is solidified by start of true adolescence (18-25). Some people are late or early bloomers, of course, but your age is very important to know. Your presence of the forum is extremely juvenile. (Juvenile in the 'childlike/immature' sense of the word, not the criminal connotation.) You make multiple posts to express a thought, you prod and joke around, and seemingly lack a serious side. These aren't bad traits at all, I'm not ragging on you for it, but because of how juvenile you are on the forum, you have the artificial appearance of an ENTP.
This is going to sound like some hard ass hypocrisy, but I wouldn't be surprised if you were an xSFJ. (Merced not protecting an Ne dom from sensor accusations? What a shocker.) I don't want to go too into detail on my reasons why I think you're an SFJ (ISFJ if we are being specific), only because there's a deeper rooted discomfort I have towards your typing and this type me thread: I don't think you know enough about MBTI to ask for advice yet. Again, that's not a bad thing, but I don't see any evidence showing that your understanding of MBTI isn't easily malleable. If a color blind person asked other people what color their shirt is, the other people answering is as far as they go in finding out. That's whatever and not very harmful until someone is trying to describe a different color and says "It's like your shirt but darker," which triggers a domino effect of inaccuracies and confusion.
Around the time when I and [MENTION=30122]Cat Brainz[/MENTION] joined the site (which was basically the same time as you), we entered the tailend of what I liked to deem 'The Fe Witch Hunt', a period of time on the forum where specifically people who identified as ENxP were being typed as ExFJ with very poor, behavior based reasoning. The theory was that people were essentially all going through FeNe loops, with their Ne being so strong and forced that it appeared to be dominant to the person self typing. This was slowly debunked across the forum, but I would argue that it left the community with a higher understanding to not type based on arbitrary things like forum presence. (I have a lot more to say on the subject but that's not the point here.)
I think you should study your functions, not your dichotomies or your types or your interpersonal styles, study your functions before anything else. That way, nothing is getting lost in translation and statements like "I'm more of an intuitive, duh" aren't redflags. Then, type yourself in the loosest way possible. Be as unspecific as possible. I recommend by acknowledging what axes you lie on. It doesn't even have to be both. Then go from there. After you type yourself using an understanding of functions and not the descriptions of types, study and research some more. Understand why and where each function is on your stack, all while remembering it's about how and why, not what. Your behavior is irrelevant for the first stages of typing. Your thought process is what MBTI is looking at, regardless of what 16personalities said in an aesthetically pleasing chart.
Don't ask people people to justify concepts you yourself can't fully comprehend. I could easily right now right a five page paper on why you're an ISFJ and it read as though I was with Carl Jung when he came up with the damn thing. My opinion about your mindspace means nothing if you can't navigate it yourself.
...I'm just really passionate about this, sorry.