SensEye
Active member
- Joined
- May 10, 2007
- Messages
- 562
- MBTI Type
- INTp
I'm pro-death penalty, but that's a whole different can of worms. I just don't understand all the fuss (and seemingly over complicated solutions) about how to carry out the deed. I've had pets euthanized. They heavily sedate them first, then once they are out, overdose them. Seems both easy and painless. Why that wouldn't work for humans is beyond me. I mean you can carry out open heart surgery and the like on sedated patients. They don't wake up from pain. I think overdosing causes a heart attack, but the subject is not going to feel it.I mean the point was that in the end they are still doing the death penalty in Alabama (how exactly is less important). In other words the concept is completely banned in EU countries. Because after the Holocaust and the gulags the practice has simply become morally unacceptable. So even the local radicals don't advocate for it. The associations are just too dark.
Anyways, this is a tiny fish to fry. The media seems to just want to stir up a controversy.