It takes but one instance to disprove a claim. I'm the one instance. Rather than change your claim, you are still carrying on. Worse still, you are making this about you, rather than focusing on the claim about EJs. If you actually gave a shit about the veracity of said claim, this trolly nonsense wouldn't be going on.
Perceiving functions (N, S) are about the accumulation/organization of information, be it concrete (S) or abstract (N).
Judging functions (T, F) are about decision making, whether it be based on reasons (T) or preferences (F). (logic vs feelings doesn't really work well at the end of the day because it's too broad and weirdly restricts people's abilities inaccurately based on functions)
Our functions are listed from dominant to inferior (I am not entertaining the possibility of shadow functions for the purposes of this discussion) based on our natural inherent ability to use them (not necessarily synonymous with strengths). So, an N dom has the inherent ability to abstractly interpret everything they experience, and an F dom has the inherent ability to assess everything they experience based on their preferences.
More in-depth:
Functions oriented extrovertedly are about either gathering info from the outside world in a manner which supports
variety (Ne, Se), or about making decisions based on what works in the real world externally to them in a manner which supports
cohesiveness (Te, Fe).
Functions oriented introvertedly are about either organizing info from the outside world in a manner which supports
certainty (Ni, Si), or about making decisions based on what works for them internally in a manner which supports
personal significance (Ti, Fi).
Dominant function imbalances:
Those with dominant perceiving functions have an imbalance involving
information.
- The Ni dominant is great at organizing abstract information internally, but isn't so great at gathering new concrete information from the external world without interpreting it abstractly.
- The Si dominant is great at organizing concrete information internally, but isn't so great at gathering new abstract information representative of abstract emerging patterns.
- The Ne dominant is great at gathering abstract emerging patterns, but isn't so great at organizing concrete information internally without interpreting in abstractly.
- The Se dominant is great at gathering concrete information, but isn't so great at internally organizing abstract patterns.
Those with dominant judging functions have an imbalance involving
decision making.
- The Fi dominant is good at making decisions based on their own preferences, but isn't so great at making decisions which are in line with the prevailing perspective of the world around them based on reasoning.
- The Ti dominant is good at making decisions based on their own reasons, but isn't so great at making decisions which are in line with the prevailing perspective of the world around them based on preferences.
- The Fe dominant is good at making decisions based on what benefits the preferences of the world around them, but isn't so great at making decisions based on their own reasoning.
- The Te dominant is good at making decisions based on what benefits the reasoning of the world around them, but isn't so great at making decisions based on their own preferences.
Therefore, the Fi dominant will repeatedly struggle significantly with "Why do you expect me to do that?" and will in their worst times respond with "Fuck your reasons!"
The Ne dominant will repeatedly struggle significantly with "Why are you trying to organize (restrict) me?" and will in their worst times respond with "Fuck your rules!"
Similarly, the Te dominant will repeatedly struggle significantly with "Why are you expecting me to cater to your preferences?" and will in their worst times respond with "Fuck your feelings!"
Translation: The Te dominant is mostly concerned with things functioning in a way which benefits peak performance of the real world, which whether you care to admit to or not is synonymous with the Fe dominant being mostly concerned with things functioning in a way which benefits the preferences of the real world. Both of you want what works best the most times, which is beneficial to the external world and measured as such. If you failed to be efficient and beneficial to the organization of the world around you, it would likely cause a bit of an identity crisis, just like but converse to an INFP who has an identity crisis when they cannot live a life in line with their own personal preferences.