Okay...maybe I don't know what you mean. What does socialism have to do with it?
I'm a socialist and so wouldnt think that's how it things have to be.
Okay...maybe I don't know what you mean. What does socialism have to do with it?
I have another question, why didn't mass shootings exist 20-30 years ago?
1991 can you math?
Anything earlier than that?
exactly there isn't.
jix I only mean to be helpful when saying you're not representing yourself or your man klan intelligently or honorably here. It makes you look like you are terribly untrustworthy when you change the rules of the game once someone meets you with 'checkmate.'
likewise...there's tons...I believe the first recorded in US history occurred in 1748. It's just that they didn't call them "shootings"...they called them "massacres". (and yes these were shootings using firearms).
man klan? what the fuck is that? the point I was trying to make was the majority of mass shootings were a recent phenomenon. For example 6 out 10 occurred within the last 30 years.
A robust measure to increase the share of women in senior management is a good thing, if they can get the job done.
Diversity for diversity's sake is a preposterous concept. Your gender, ethnicity, patronym, religion, political views are not qualifications.
Quotas will prove nefarious in the long run. I don't subscribe to that psychosis. I don't mind having an all-women workforce if they have what it takes. Meritocracy is the law.
I didn't mean to be offensive but I'm now realizing I should have probably used a 'c' instead of a 'k' (I have learned from you in this thread how your views differ from MRA...but I don't imagine you are the only one of your kind).
Anyway, I don't think it is a recent phenomenon but that doesn't mean you can't find a way to blame feminism for the ones occurring after the turn of the century. I see you guys do this kind of thing all the time.
I don't think it's just to blame something like a shooting on one sole purpose. There are many causes and many of them come together. Liberals as always will blame white men and guns, while conservatives will blame isis but the truth is much more objective than confirmation bias to ones ideology.
You are certainly entitled to your opinions. No one can deny what you have personally seen and experienced, or how you feel when you hear about feminism, or meet a self-identified feminist. It would be silly for me to tell you that you are wrong. I will instead share what I see and experience.
When I think of feminism, I think of a couple grandmothers I know who threw their hearts and souls into campaigning for Barack Obama, in the hope that he would make a better world for their grandchildren and everyone else. I think of the instructors at the women's self-defense classes at my workplace, and the woman I met there who had already been a victim of sexual assault and was determined for it not to happen again. I think of my polyamorous friends, with whom I attended a recent Pride march, along with their husband and kids. I think of my STEM education colleagues, who provide female role models for young students, both boys and girls, so the idea that "girls can be anything they want" is more than just a theory.
The feminists I know are living feminism in their daily lives. Most are also promoting it in some broader sense, whether in their workplace, through political activity, or in a volunteer group. Yes, many people are more comfortable when women - like those who have to work twice as hard as a man for the same rewards - stay quiet about the bias that still affects them. I understand how speaking up can come at a high cost for such women. Pretending the problem doesn't exist, though, will not help to solve it.
Negative. Because it is not feminism. Feminism is about strong women and most of women are not strong, neither capable to be a warrior.
Negative. Because it is not feminism. Feminism is about strong women and most of women are not strong, neither capable to be a warrior.
Negative. Because it is not feminism. Feminism is about strong women and most of women are not strong, neither capable to be a warrior.
I am fairly certain that the most of these would be able to fight you. (perhaps even without guns)