God is a mystery in philosophy, but to the subjective perspective, and psychological account in the affairs of people, there is an account of God to be understood, that doesn't render a neat metaphysical system, because the onus falls onto deliberating action, and not external conditions of limitation. Anything is 'possible', even science tells us a spoon could 'magically' begin to levitate, there is nothing to prevent it from doing so, its just highly 'unlikely' for it to occur when God is taken to be Statistical in character. And yet we as entities, have the power to remove liberties away from Statistical possibility (in general, our actions shape and offer controls to the environment, or at the very least, command to our mental filter of perceptions), we can delimit the nature of 'outcomes' by our works, depending on the wisdom and character of those deliberations, and how these works correlate and communicate with whatever else is active within the theater of our actions' grasp.
A key part of deliberation then, is knowledge of action, with a corresponding knowledge of err on being acted upon: if you've ever experienced the shift in your soul after uncovering aspects of nescience within your belief-system, you will realize that limitations of freedom stem from knowledge claims that [by necessary implication] encumber the mind in a way that degrades the potency of deliberation, in the delivery to a reconciliation. This natural tendency for people to execute their intentions and queries, is consequently confused when succumbing to a culture that doesn't understand and teach the fundamentals and structure of free-thinking in the context of the full breadth of psychological processes/capacities— where being demented and cognitively abused is part of the bedrock of acculturation, which has in recent times only been exacerbated by the "liberal" and permissive approaches that simply structure disorientation into the process of attrition that the young endure; there is no substitute for understanding the mind and maintaining its health with communication that doesn't entice delusional paradigms that seduce with power, yet taste of incarceration by the development of an 'adulthood' that cannot escape its own consequence, even if the liberal fashion is to defer these shortcomings onto a collective-sin (which in my view, is the darkest manifestation of a psychologically-opaque-fascism, perpetrating a blind spiritual engagement with the self [where the self is regarded as an agent in the narrative of a world authority, merely a cog for this Leviathan of morality,— abolishing the task of individual deliberation, with the promise of imaginary redemption, vicariously bestowed onto a unified model of society (I could go on about how these models aren't even conceptually functional, its like a religion of believing in "square circles", they can say the words, and they except their opponents to construct it for themselves, or it just proves how oppression their being by refusing to manufacture the "square circles" as the threats of destabilization escalate to hasten the redemption by delusional-collective-expectation]).
