• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

What's your religion?

Stol11

New member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
43
MBTI Type
ENTJ
So it's egocentric for God to care about his own creation, particularly the one he made in his own image? I mean God can't have a relationship with mankind? :huh:

Well considering the sheer scale and vastness of the universe, surely it is perverse that God can care only about this little speck amongst billions of stars and planets. All of the major faiths evolved before the workings of the universe were truly realised. Therefore a bronze age God could only be imagined with humanity solely in mind (as that is all that people knew to be true at the time). Humanity is lucky to be alive considering all of the collapsing stars and imploding galaxy's that God created in his universe, as well as a planet where 98% of all species that have ever existed have become extinct.
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
Well considering the sheer scale and vastness of the universe, surely it is perverse that God can care only about this little speck amongst billions of stars and planets.

Considering the possible omnipotent nature of God, I don't see how that is necessarily so. Only from a materialist perspective does this make sense.

All of the major faiths evolved before the workings of the universe were truly realised.

True but metaphysics concerns itself with matter that is eternal and unchangeable, as defined by Aristotle. You'd be suprised to note how many scientific theories today have parallels or basis in ancient metaphysical or cosmological theories. The Bing Bang theory for example can be seen as a modern-day modification of the Stoic "fire" principle:
In accord with this ontology, the Stoics, like the Epicureans, make God material. But while the Epicureans think the gods are too busy being blessed and happy to be bothered with the governance of the universe (Epicurus, Letter to Menoeceus 123–4), the Stoic God is immanent throughout the whole of creation and directs its development down to the smallest detail. God is identical with one of the two ungenerated and indestructible first principles (archai) of the universe. One principle is matter which they regard as utterly unqualified and inert. It is that which is acted upon. God is identified with an eternal reason (logos, Diog. Laert. 44B ) or intelligent designing fire (Aetius, 46A) which structures matter in accordance with Its plan. This plan is enacted time and time again, beginning from a state in which all is fire, through the generation of the elements, to the creation of the world we are familiar with, and eventually back to fire in a cycle of endless recurrence. The designing fire of the conflagration is likened to a sperm which contains the principles or stories of all the things which will subsequently develop (Aristocles in Eusebius, 46G). Under this guise, God is also called ‘fate.’ It is important to realise that the Stoic God does not craft its world in accordance with its plan from the outside, as the demiurge in Plato's Timaeus is described as doing. Rather, the history of the universe is determined by God's activity internal to it, shaping it with its differentiated characteristics. The biological conception of God as a kind of living heat or seed from which things grow seems to be fully intended. The further identification of God with pneuma or breath may have its origins in medical theories of the Hellenistic period. See Baltzly (2003).

Stoicism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

So I wouldn't cut the ancients short. Nietzsche was no friend of religion, but even he noted that while our descriptions of the world have become more complex(thanks in part to science), our explainations are still at the same level as in Plato's day.
 

Will2911

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
41
MBTI Type
ESTJ
If only humanity had come up with the theory of evolution before inventing the written word. Or invented web forums before swords so they could sarcastically deconstruct each others' posts instead of killing each other.

Probably would of caused more wars, etc. I mean it hardly created tolerance, infact it made racism and other similar ideas popular and fashionable again.
 

Mole

Permabanned
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
20,299
The 98% Extinct and the Neanderthals

Well considering the sheer scale and vastness of the universe, surely it is perverse that God can care only about this little speck amongst billions of stars and planets. All of the major faiths evolved before the workings of the universe were truly realised. Therefore a bronze age God could only be imagined with humanity solely in mind (as that is all that people knew to be true at the time). Humanity is lucky to be alive considering all of the collapsing stars and imploding galaxy's that God created in his universe, as well as a planet where 98% of all species that have ever existed have become extinct.

I worry about the Neanderthals. They are mentioned nowhere in the Bible. But they must have stowed away on the Ark, for gene sequencing tells us they managed to pass some of their genes on.

The Mormons for instance don't record any Neanderthal names in their book of life. And is seems even we don't know any Neanderthal names. And the Bible tells us our ancestry, but fails to mention the Neanderthals.

Will the Neanderthals be able to forgive this oversight? Will the Neanderthals welcome us into heaven, or will they accuse us of making them non-persons? Or will they make the unforgivable assertion that we wiped them out? And will they mention the G word (Genocide)?

Have you noticed there are no Neanderthal teddy bears? And although it is fashionable to claim a Sioux ancestor, no one traces their family tree back to the Neanderthals. What! Are we ashamed of the Neanderthals that we would obliterate the very mention of them from the Bible? And just as the Soviets airbrushed those out of favour, we have airbrushed the Neanderthals out of the Bible.

What this must do to their psyches I don't know.
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
I should also mention that adherence to Holy Scriptures does not necessarily preclude an acceptance of scientific fact, as was outlined by St. Augustine of Hippo in the 5th century, whose position is nicely summarised here:
[youtube="BR0qnfKAFYY"]Science vs religion?[/youtube]
 

Manis

New member
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
47
MBTI Type
INFP
Probably would of caused more wars, etc. I mean it hardly created tolerance, infact it made racism and other similar ideas popular and fashionable again.

Yes I know you hate the internet, but think about how awesome a 'lolsabretooth' site would have been. Or were you talking about the theory of evolution :shock:
 

Will2911

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2010
Messages
41
MBTI Type
ESTJ
Yes I know you hate the internet, but think about how awesome a 'lolsabretooth' site would have been. Or were you talking about the theory of evolution :shock:

I don't hate the Internet. Well not entirely, I just think that the Internet has the potential to be one of the single most dangerous ideas in the history of the planet.

The Internet has changed the world beyond recognition, it has made things like Child Pornogrophy easily acsesible. It has also lowered the barriers between nations, and has allowed things like facebook to destroy privacy.Crime has also evolved because of the web.

I was in fact reffferimg to Evolution, which was at the time a cause of Racism becoming fashionable again. I mean in the early 19th century and the late 18th you had theabolishionist movement, and people in Western Europe we're moving more towards tolerance. Evolution meant that peoplehad an excuse to be racist, as people thought non whites were less evolved.

In many ways the internet has reinforced that sort of attitude.
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
I don't hate the Internet. Well not entirely, I just think that the Internet has the potential to be one of the single most dangerous ideas in the history of the planet.

The Internet has changed the world beyond recognition, it has made things like Child Pornogrophy easily acsesible. It has also lowered the barriers between nations, and has allowed things like facebook to destroy privacy.Crime has also evolved because of the web.

I was in fact reffferimg to Evolution, which was at the time a cause of Racism becoming fashionable again. I mean in the early 19th century and the late 18th you had theabolishionist movement, and people in Western Europe we're moving more towards tolerance. Evolution meant that peoplehad an excuse to be racist, as people thought non whites were less evolved.

In many ways the internet has reinforced that sort of attitude.

Platitudes concerning "progress" certainly is one major plague of modernity that's blinded men greatly.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,639
Platitudes concerning "progress" certainly is one major plague of modernity that's blinded men greatly.

Peguy is always awesome in these kinds of threads.

I need a dozen like him, then we can finally storm the Chateau where the SS are holding the hostages.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,639
Only such an egocentric faith could believe that God's role and purpose is centred on humanity, a supreme being that truly cares about the petty thoughts and actions of individuals.

Dude God loves you, I think you're being a bit of a dick to be honest but God still loves you.
 
S

Sniffles

Guest
Dude God loves you, I think you're being a bit of a dick to be honest but God still loves you.

The notion of a personal loving God is so alien to rationalist thinking. Only an impersonal unloveable God is acceptable.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,639
The notion of a personal loving God is so alien to rationalist thinking. Only an impersonal unloveable God is acceptable.

Is that what Deists believe right enough? I was wondering about Voltaire on this topic the other day when I was browsing Amazon but I might not bother now.
 

swordpath

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
10,547
MBTI Type
ISTx
Enneagram
5w6
If God created man with the intent and sole purpose of our worshiping him, how is there really any personal and individual importance of us [humans]? We're here as a source of empowering and boosting God. We're like disposable pawns that make headway for the King and reinforce the notion that he is supreme. That seems like a selfish system.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,639
If God created man with the intent and purpose of our worshiping him, how is there really and personal and individual importance of us [humans]? We're here as a source of empowering and boosting God. We're like disposable pawns that make headway for the King.

So what religion does this make you Beat?

AVAST! MATEY!! Ninja borders!! Repel borders!!
 

swordpath

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
10,547
MBTI Type
ISTx
Enneagram
5w6
I'm agnostic, believing there MAY be higher power, but in all likeliness whoever that higher power may be (if it exists), he's typically apathetic in nature and ultimately a bit malicious.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,639
I'm agnostic, believing there MAY be higher power, but in all likeliness whoever that higher power may be (if it exists), he's typically apathetic in nature and ultimately a bit malicious.

I see. Just like Japan. I've never seen it, only have others word to go by that its there.
 

swordpath

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
10,547
MBTI Type
ISTx
Enneagram
5w6
Pictures, products, people, stories from the living... Enough of a case to basically guarantee that it is there.
 

Lark

Active member
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
29,639
Pictures, products, people, stories from the living... Enough of a case to basically guarantee that it is there.

I know, less difficult to believe it yet I've pretty much got the same evidence of God's existence and it can be more difficult to believe in, age we live in huh?
 
Top