Peter Deadpan
phallus impudicus
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2016
- Messages
- 8,864
To be honest I think that the good chunk of stuff in this thread is more related to toxic environment than being So last.
How would you know?
To be honest I think that the good chunk of stuff in this thread is more related to toxic environment than being So last.
How would you know?
Chicken/egg argument.If there is someone here that knows something about toxic unfriendly environment that is probably me. I mean the whole thing made a major distortion on my persona that took the effort to fix.
Here is how my variant test looked some 10 year ago.
Sexual |||||| 14%
Social |||||| 18%
Self Preservation |||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Therefore I claim that everyone who really really isn't interested in social stuff is almost certainly the person that grew up in bad/toxic environment. As a matter of fact I know more real life examples of this.
I even used to think that I have the same tritype archetype as you due to this, but I just don't have emo/reactive stuff of e4.
If there is someone here that knows something about toxic unfriendly environment that is probably me. I mean the whole thing made a major distortion on my persona that took the effort to fix.
Here is how my variant test looked some 10 year ago.
Sexual |||||| 14%
Social |||||| 18%
Self Preservation |||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 90%
Therefore I claim that everyone who really really isn't interested in social stuff is almost certainly the person that grew up in bad/toxic environment. As a matter of fact I know more real life examples of this.
I even used to think that I have the same tritype archetype as you due to this, but I just don't have emo/reactive stuff of e4.
Chicken/egg argument.
Exactly my point.
Under certain circumstances all you can get from egg is chicken.
Science backs this up. In order for behavioural genes to express, they require environmental triggers.I don't necessarily disagree with the nurture influence, but Bechimo is right. I think we are probably predisposed to certain characteristics and that environment will further mold that.
I'd love to see more research on enneagram and instincts, like perhaps looking at separated twins later in life, but I don't think that is going to happen anytime soon.
Science backs this up. In order for behavioural genes to express, they require environmental triggers.
Also, are instinctual variants inherent? Don't think I've seen any literature that states this, which doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't anything out there.
Yeah, I was applying inherency from the base level of DNA, rather than DNA + RNA impact.I have heard that enneagram type is inherent but nothing of instincts. Much of the literature I've read about instincts does mention formative circumstances in the descriptions, so it may be implied.
I have a random question that is truly not intended to insult but rather act as a small experiment to test a theory: Have you ever wondered if you were a sociopath?
***Not even remotely implying you are, just wondering about your own thought processes***
(This also has nothing to do with this thread or comment, so feel free to move it to Off Topic)
Of course I did and I made quite a few jokes at my own expense that I actually am.
But not really: socipath wouldn't make extra effort to give the poor on regular basis, it probably wouldn't go out to get the food and meds for someone during the snow storm, it wouldn't help the blind guy to finnish the college, it wouldn't bail out the family member .... etc. I can be socially awkward but my work/impact can hardly be called sociopatic actually.
Neither you are the first woman who asked me something like this.![]()
I haven't known an INTx 5 So/Sp who doesn't frequently ask themselves this.
Reminds me of a Bill Hicks quote.
"People who hate people, come together!"
"... No."
Yeah^. In other words, people like me (a card-carrying hermit) are boned when it comes to job-hunting. :/
Social (aka “Adaptiveâ€) Instinct
Just as many people tend to misidentify themselves as Sexual types because they want one-on-one relationships, many people fail to recognize themselves as Social types because they get the (false) idea that this means always being involved in groups, meetings, and parties. If Self-Preservation types are interested in adjusting the environment to make themselves more secure and comfortable, Social types adapt themselves to serve the needs of the social situation they find themselves in. Thus, Social types are highly aware of other people, whether they are in intimate situations or in groups. They are also aware of how their actions and attitudes are affecting those around them. Moreover, Sexual types seek intimacy, Social types seek personal connection: they want to stay in long-term contact with people and to be involved in their world. Social types are the most concerned with doing things that will have some impact on their community, or even broader domains. They tend to be warmer, more open, engaging, and socially responsible than the other two types. In their primary relationships, they seek partners with whom they can share social activities, wanting their intimates to get involved in projects and events with them. Paradoxically, they actually tend to avoid long periods of exclusive intimacy and quiet solitude, seeing both as potentially limiting.] Social types lose their sense of identity and meaning when they are not involved with others in activities that transcend their individual interests.
Also, are instinctual variants inherent? Don't think I've seen any literature that states this, which doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't anything out there.