The first part isn't bad until the heading "Gynocentrism is a sex-based form of exploitation".
I think part of the problem is that the author of the article is unwilling to analyze the situation along class-based lines (although he approaches this at times, often by speaking of a "female aristocracy"), because that's too commie. His discussion of a female aristocracy creating gynocentrism is curious. I have a hard time buying that in societies where women were barred from inheritance were somehow gynecocracies. When female monarchs did exist, they often struggled with legitimacy and in many cases where they did have legitimacy, they were de facto rulers rather than de jure rulers.
The basic "system" he describes existing now isn't necessarily inaccurate, but the supposed causes of it seem fairly dubious. The terminology is also highly misleading, although I suppose someone could say the same thing about patriarchy . To his credit, he doesn't prattle on about beta cucks and I will give him that, as well.
A basic problem all discussions about gender fall into is the absence of a shared vocabulary. The insistence of this article upon certain terminology serves to obscure his point and make his article less intelligible, but that's because he's part of a movement. I would suggest the author consider stepping outside the movement when writing in order to make his ideas easier to understand. It's not that he needs to start smashing the patriarchy, it's that his use of terms like "gynocracy" and "golden uterus" aren't great for building bridges.
I take issue with that terminology because I find it places the blame upon women to an inaccurate and unfair extent. I wouldn't say that I don't believe women never perpetuate these attitudes, but I would say that there are in fact, lots of men that do. Consider, for instance, the criss with policing at the moment. I don't buy that an accurate way to describe the force animating these policies and these behavior as "gynocentrism". Am I seriously expected to believe that men want to play out their power fantasies of being Charles Bronson or Clint Eastwood on the force because of something called gynocentrism?
