Kierva
#KUWK
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2010
- Messages
- 2,469
- Enneagram
- 6w7
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
It's because your temperament scores came out as follows NF=0,NT=3,SP=1,SJ=-4
So it thinks you are an NT.
How do you know what the temperament scores are?
It's because your temperament scores came out as follows NF=0,NT=3,SP=1,SJ=-4
So it thinks you are an NT.
How do you know what the temperament scores are?
It stores the results in a database each time someone takes it so I can see how the test is working. That's how I'm analyzing the results and finding the logic errors and whatnot.
It stores the results in a database each time someone takes it so I can see how the test is working. That's how I'm analyzing the results and finding the logic errors and whatnot.
How is the temperament scored?
Also, I think you edited my post instead of replying to it.
I can't really tell for sure but there aren't many ENTJ results. Maybe this one
NF=0,NT=4,SP=-1,SJ=-3
Te=4,Ti=0,Fe=-8,Fi=4,Ne=-1,Ni=1,Se=4,Si=-4
ESFP makes sense cognitive function wise but the temperament is throwing things off. Also, there is a three way tie between Te, Fi and Se which doesn't help.
How is the temperament scored?
Also, I think you edited my post instead of replying to it.
I can't really tell for sure but there aren't many ENTJ results. Maybe this one
NF=0,NT=4,SP=-1,SJ=-3
Te=4,Ti=0,Fe=-8,Fi=4,Ne=-1,Ni=1,Se=4,Si=-4
ESFP makes sense cognitive function wise but the temperament is throwing things off. Also, there is a three way tie between Te, Fi and Se which doesn't help.
Edit: Oh I get it. It's the answer to the first few questions. You're analytical, competent, independent and calm. You're not picking the SP descriptors because your a dominant introverted thinker. Have to think about that.
My theory is that using two systems can increase the accuracy because it increases the number of data points. There are many ways to do this though as you suggest. Choosing something other than one simple way like function order or dichotomies does end up leading to some more complex logic though which is why there are a few logic mistakes in this current test (in process of being addressed). Also since I can see what questions are working and what ones aren't I can and am tuning those over time as well.i challenge you to make this work.
to increase the accuracy, i would make the test prioritize function stacking over temperament traits.
unfortunately, the issue with that approach is that you wind up with superfluous elements. at that point, why not just have two separate tests?
so, you may have to map entire function orders to temperament traits so questions and results always converge with each other.
i'd probably make questions that are unique for each type and give them points for function usage. for instance a question like 'i like to take calculated risks' (an stp trait) would also yield points for ti and se if the test-taker said it applied to them.
i'm interested to see what you can produce with this.![]()
INFP
Fi > Ni = Ne = Fe > Ti > Si > Se > Te
Something went wrong there.
[MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION]
Rational
ENTP
Ne > Ni = Ti > Si = Te > Fi = Fe > Se
This is similar to my last results on Nardi's test.
Freak.Alright, so feedback. This is without knowing what underlies the test, and I also haven't read through other folks' results.
[MENTION=8936]highlander[/MENTION]: What are the circumstances that lead to results being inconclusive? Ties? If so -- is there anything that you can give the user, such as what tied and what didn't? A result might be "inconclusive" in terms of finding one specific type, but is there anything that it can spit out, such as temperament?
edit: I took it a second time and got inconclusive again.
And then I took the test a third time -- as if I were the INFPest INFP in the world, and it worked --
Fi > Ne > Fe > Se = Ni > Ti > Si > Te
-- so at least it's not just some screwup with e.g. cookies on my machine.
F
We could make this more fun by saying
"You are divergent, you are meant to lead an soapy teenagers' rebellion and discover a terrible truth that shall shake the foundations of your society"![]()
The following is a link to a new personality test I’ve been developing. The logic is still undergoing some final testing. To support that testing, I’m asking your help by taking the test and providing any feedback you might have. You may have seen bits and pieces of this in some of the threads I’ve been participating in recently.
Based on the results of this testing over the next five days and subsequent tweaks to the logic, I’ll be publishing the test more broadly. Thank you in advance for your help!
Typologycentral Kiersey and Jung Test
There are five different logic paths that attempt to leverage temperament first and then cognitive function order with decreasing levels of reliance on the temperament questions if things are not leading to a clear result. You end up as inconclusive if you fall into the pure cognitive function order logic and based on the ordering of the preferences, the result doesn't match any type. An example of that is as follows. Result shows NT (Rational) but cognitive function order preference is Ni = Ti = Ne > Te > Se > Fi > Si > Fe. It's a pretty nuanced case. There's no way to figure out the type in that case. They could be an INTP, INTJ, or ENTP
The issue is adding the permutations of the logic to provide that. We certainly could but I haven't thought about how. It's a good ideal for an enhancement.Could your test at least share that rather than nothing at all..?