MaxMad244
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2022
- Messages
- 253
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
I've been following the news lately and I'm seeing some crazy stuff. 1.5 million refugees? Jesus christ.
Even if Ukraine wins the war now, the place it totally leveled. This is the worst possible scenario for Ukraine sans nuclear disaster. The only thing worse that could happen is either mass genocide or a nuclear disaster. This is literally, next to those two things, the most horrible thing that could have happened. The Ukrainian people will now forever be displaced and Russia will annex another territory like Crimea. The U.S. will absolutely not help at all as that would most certainly result in a global nuclear war and there will be no winners. As much weaker as Russia is than the U.S. in terms of pure military might, having as much nuclear weaponry in your arsenal pretty much renders the rest of it useless. Both sides have thousands of subs with armed nuclear weapons pointed at each other, and even if the US nukes Russia with thirty nukes, Russia will absolutely at least get 5 to 10 off on us.
How did this happen? How did the worst case scenario occur? Obviously Putin is a ruthless and Machiavellian dictator, but how did the leaders of Ukraine, and Nato, fail Ukraine so badly? I mean if you're going to join Nato, can't you do it after taking out Putin? Why openly taunt a dictator? I get it...freedom is worth fighting for...but are you fighting the freedom or are the Ukrainian farmers getting slaughtered now for freedom in a meaningless fashion when you could have been more clandestine and sneaky about it?
I don't get it...I mean the leader of Finland, after Russia invaded, told Putin she was going to join Nato. Okay? Yeah, please do, but keep your mouth closed until we actually eliminate the threat because you taunting the dictator in the name of some abstract concept is resulting in aggravated and inflamed aggressions. I am sure Putin's army executed a bunch of Ukrainians after the leader of Finland spoke. Just keep your mouth closed and stop aggravating the dictator until we can take him out with assassins.
It is obvious that Putin here is the evil actor, but how did the leaders around the area contribute to this devastating outcome? After all, there were other options to defeating Putin that would resulted in way less death and tragedy, and they were simple and easy compared to the outcome. Sometimes I wonder if comedians really should be leaders.
Even if Ukraine wins the war now, the place it totally leveled. This is the worst possible scenario for Ukraine sans nuclear disaster. The only thing worse that could happen is either mass genocide or a nuclear disaster. This is literally, next to those two things, the most horrible thing that could have happened. The Ukrainian people will now forever be displaced and Russia will annex another territory like Crimea. The U.S. will absolutely not help at all as that would most certainly result in a global nuclear war and there will be no winners. As much weaker as Russia is than the U.S. in terms of pure military might, having as much nuclear weaponry in your arsenal pretty much renders the rest of it useless. Both sides have thousands of subs with armed nuclear weapons pointed at each other, and even if the US nukes Russia with thirty nukes, Russia will absolutely at least get 5 to 10 off on us.
How did this happen? How did the worst case scenario occur? Obviously Putin is a ruthless and Machiavellian dictator, but how did the leaders of Ukraine, and Nato, fail Ukraine so badly? I mean if you're going to join Nato, can't you do it after taking out Putin? Why openly taunt a dictator? I get it...freedom is worth fighting for...but are you fighting the freedom or are the Ukrainian farmers getting slaughtered now for freedom in a meaningless fashion when you could have been more clandestine and sneaky about it?
I don't get it...I mean the leader of Finland, after Russia invaded, told Putin she was going to join Nato. Okay? Yeah, please do, but keep your mouth closed until we actually eliminate the threat because you taunting the dictator in the name of some abstract concept is resulting in aggravated and inflamed aggressions. I am sure Putin's army executed a bunch of Ukrainians after the leader of Finland spoke. Just keep your mouth closed and stop aggravating the dictator until we can take him out with assassins.
It is obvious that Putin here is the evil actor, but how did the leaders around the area contribute to this devastating outcome? After all, there were other options to defeating Putin that would resulted in way less death and tragedy, and they were simple and easy compared to the outcome. Sometimes I wonder if comedians really should be leaders.