I'm wondering if flattery from other women gets run through a different set of filters.
It does for me. If a woman stranger compliments me I figure she has no interest in getting something from me (phone number, date) I tend to think it's sincere. And I can tell by what women compliment like shoes, purses, hair, etc. Men seem to stay to the more general "You look nice/you smell good."
I am conjecturing that some types of women enjoy the comments because those are the type of men they are looking for -- straight, to the point, not a lot of style, pretty simplistic. Other women think it's classy for a guy not to go the overt route and deal with her as a person/mind/whatever first. So they would be extremely unhappy with the other sort of guy... and those guys would probably be disappointed as well in a relationship with such a woman.
I guess it's like self-selection at work, but I guess HS can comment more on that.
Is compliments just a "feel good thing" or also a "get you thinking thing"? My first reaction towards a woman complimenting me is "that's nice..." then I think about why they said it, not exactly looking for hidden intentions but what they pay attention to and thus what are they interested in.
Question for females:
How do you feel when you're just going about your day [i.e., are not trying to look attractive or get any attention] and a man unexpectedly says, "Wow, you're really good-looking / cute / gorgeous!" or makes some other comment about your appearance?
Is this generally a welcome thing, or does it become bothersome after awhile, or.... Well, what's your perception?
All right -- to expand a little, how about in welcome threads or "What We Look Like" threads?
Interesting post. Regarding the concept of communication as manipulation, there is one important distinction. I have always understood manipulation to be the process of getting a person to respond without their full consent. This is achieved through deceit, withholding information, intimidation, etc. Communication can simply inform if it respects the boundaries of individual consent. To me informing someone of the danger of standing in the middle of the road and allowing them to make their choice is different than assuming you have to find some way to force them into safety and so continue to distort information or threaten to achieve that end. Compliments can be used to inform someone. That is different than using the compliment to achieve a result unrelated to the compliment. If the compliment is the end, then it is not manipulation, if it is a means, then it is. What do you think about that?An important secondary aspect, though, comes from the models that say communication is actually manipulation. Manipulation of the target of an information exchange might not be inherently negative (for example, I might tell you not to stand in the middle of the freeway - I'm trying to manipulate you into moving, but it is probably good advice nevertheless). At the same time, we can intuitively understand that the person's goals might not be our own. In this subject, this might be things like idle flattery in order to get the other person to do something, or at a minimum to be better disposed toward the flatterer. So here, we'd expect the development of BS filters - something that lets you figure out whether the person means what they say, or why they're saying it.
If the compliment is the end, then it is not manipulation, if it is a means, then it is. What do you think about that?
Yeah, I was thinking about that after typing it. A compliment is not generally given to 'inform' someone only. No one is that robotic I'm guessing.There're more than two ways of compliments: You can compliment someone on their looks just to intentionally make them feel better and happy. I wouldn't say it's a manipulation.
Interesting post. Regarding the concept of communication as manipulation, there is one important distinction. I have always understood manipulation to be the process of getting a person to respond without their full consent. This is achieved through deceit, withholding information, intimidation, etc. Communication can simply inform if it respects the boundaries of individual consent. To me informing someone of the danger of standing in the middle of the road and allowing them to make their choice is different than assuming you have to find some way to force them into safety and so continue to distort information or threaten to achieve that end. Compliments can be used to inform someone. That is different than using the compliment to achieve a result unrelated to the compliment. If the compliment is the end, then it is not manipulation, if it is a means, then it is. What do you think about that?
However, in threads or anything where someone says "OMG ur Os hAwT"...I tend to want to beat them about the face and neck until they learn to spell correctly. So far, this hasn't happened in threads, but it has happened in online games...
However, in threads or anything where someone says "OMG ur Os hAwT"...I tend to want to beat them about the face and neck until they learn to spell correctly. So far, this hasn't happened in threads, but it has happened in online games...those people also make me want to run very far very fast.
Kyrielle said:I feel like preening myself a little and telling myself silently, "Either he's crazy. Or I rock today.
My guess is that if women are getting creeped out by your flattery you aren't doing it right. Backhanded flattery is almost always a winner. It's when you deliver it directly and sincerely and look for a response that women will rightly be unsettled and suspicious.
if there's such a thing as backhanded and sincere..i think that would be best. or at least in my opinion.
Heh, no that's the Suspicious Female Compliment. By backhanded compliment I mean a compliment which compliments you on the way to saying something else entirely. Examples:
"Jane, see if you can get him to give us an extension - he has a soft spot for pretty girls."
"I never trust pretty people (no offence) because TV has tried to teach me that inner beauty translates into outer beauty minus style. I don't accept that."
When asked for a favour: "Dammit woman! Don't use your allure on me, I am immune to such things! Oh alright."
Okay, these examples are pretty lame, but you hopefully get the general idea. The more understated the backhanded compliment, the more likely the complimentee is to think you didn't even really realize you gave it. If they think that, then they automatically think that you were sincere in the compliment and that you weren't using the compliment from any ulterior motive. They are under no obligation to respond to the compliment and, indeed (when done correctly), must awkwardly manhandle the flow of conversation somewhat in order to address the compliment.