It's easier for them to prey on the weak. They're bored with their lives, and depending on how toxic they are, don't interact or feed them...otherwise stand up for yourself.
I'd like if people here could talk about their experiences of bullying, and if anyone's found a way to deal with it, what is it?
Parents - how do you deal with it when your children get bullied?
I'm interested in comments from people who might be or have been bullies themselves. I want to explore the mindset of both bully and victim, in the hope that I'll be inspired with *something* to tell my 11 year old daughter when she comes home crying again tomorrow![]()
Kid getting bullied? Teach them Krav Maga. Kick between legs, punch to temple/back of head, choke, etc...
Bullies bully people that don't fight back. Once that bully gets his ass whooped, he won't come back.
I used to wonder whether I became how I am because of the bullying and ostracism. Then I considered that perhaps I was bullied and ostracised because of how I am. I'm not sure it matters one way or another.
My dad is bully, how can I solve this problem?
Very simple advice :
Let's say : someone is bullied at school.
If serious disciplinary action against the bully is not taken, it means the school's top management is accomplice to bullying. By experience they don't defend bullies' victims seriously, and if they do say so they lie most of the time. If someone has two faces, don't look at any of these faces. Fraudulent authorities are children's worst enemies.
Serious disciplinary action means, e.g. for a punch towards a child in 3 rolling years :
1st time : formal warning at least
2nd time : short suspension at least
3rd time : long suspension at least
4th time : expulsion at least
This could easily be turned against the victim. Let's say this one kid is being bullied relentlessly, and one day he decides to punch the bully. Under this, the victim would end up being punished.
Simple advice in this case : the victim was wrongfully punished..[/B]
Fine, but do you trust school administrators to make such a distinction?
It's necessary, but not sufficient.
Disciplinary action has to be taken against the bully. Disciplinary action against the victim is acceptable only if he gave a gravely disproportionate response. If response was the same or barely more important, no disciplinary action has to be taken against the victim. If it does be, remove the kid from school because the school has become out of trust.
The school does not make its work as a school, it's not a valid school. Your child is more important than the school, and your child's interests are a priority.
I don't what school you're talking about. I usually saw bullies and victims get like suspended, the victim just for defending him/herself if the bully threw a punch.
I punched back. And was often in trouble for it. Sometimes teachers only caught the end of it and the instigators got off scot free while I got sent to the office.
I still advocate punching back. IME, school authority figures are hopelessly inept and can't be counted on to handle these situations fairly or nip bullying in the bud. In some cases, I even saw teachers take the side of bullies, making it obvious they were probably themselves bullies growing up.
On the one hand, I wish this were an option for more parents. Most cannot afford to send children to a school other than the (mostly free) public school in their town or district. They cannot homeschool because they have to work. COVID-19 has upset alot of these routines, forcing many parents into effectively homeschooling, so my comment applies to more normal times. On the other hand, though, because few families have other options, short of moving to another town, I would prefer communities bite the bullet and address this issue once and for all. Staffing shortages are an obvious place to start. School staff are reluctant to penalize what they don't witness, and are more likely to witness something if there simply are more of them: smaller class sizes, and dedicated health staff like nurses and counselors. I don't know how far that would get, but it's more than we have now.It's a general... school case, which could be applied in analoguous situations. In this case, the advice is unchanged for me : you remove the kid from the school. The school failed. Don't let your kid fail.
The victim punch case is only for failure from the school to discipline the bully while on difficulty to move to another school, I mean it's the last chance you give your school. They didn't take their last chance, you terminate. Period.
As someone who was bullied, I agree: no child should have to put up with that, and school staff who don't put a stop to it are complicit. Bullying teaches the wrong lessons to all involved.
Most cannot afford to send children to a school other than the (mostly free) public school in their town or district. They cannot homeschool because they have to work.
In theory this is a decent idea, but requires children to be at a reasonable age to be left to their own devices, a child to have the self motivation to learn, an environment which is conducive for self learning, and for parents to have some sort of background in how education works. These are not feasible constraints for a lot of people and, especially since bullying itself is a major cause of mental health issues (such as depression, which is a massive killer of motivation), is even more so. Children are definitely not stupid, and with the right push many can accomplish a lot of things that you would never expect, but without the right background in skills and, for some children, discipline, self learning about subjects that must be understood for eventual integration into adulthood can often be difficult without the hand of a tutor or parents giving a bit of direction.Simple idea in this case : the parents work normally. No need to imitate traditional teaching with 2-hour sessions for each course. Just teach self-teaching and demand (I did mean demand and not ask) them to do some homework. The child will probably be willing to do it if he knows that's the only reasonable way to avoid bullying. I mean, many poor parents are able to tell their children "I wish I could give you more home comfort or better food or better toys, but we can't afford them". Children are not stupid. I think I'll teach my son economics before 7 because I think teaching these subjects at late teenage or early adulthood is a retarded thing to do. Most college-like things can be taught to children if prepared in the appropriate way.
Homeschooling may take only a hour a day for the parents.
Isolation shouldn't be feared too much. Online socialization is real socialization.