• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

A.I replacing women in the future

Codex

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
820
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Finally! We can live our lives in peace without constantly being disturbed.
Guy hassling you on the dance floor? Hello meet my A.I . * continues dancing*
Don't want to carry a baby and don't want to deal with a human surrogate? No problem! A.I women come with prebuilt baby ovens!

Imo? Heaven.
 

chubber

failed poetry slam career
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
4,413
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Finally! We can live our lives in peace without constantly being disturbed.
Guy hassling you on the dance floor? Hello meet my A.I . * continues dancing*
Don't want carry a baby and don't want to deal with a human surrogate? No problem! A.I women come with prebuilt baby ovens!

Imo? Heaven.

:laugh: you made it sound like Michael Keaton in Multiplicity (1996). Need a handy man? No problem! Only problem, everyone in the end of the day had a go with his wife. Which got him upset.
 

Luke O

Super Ape
Joined
Mar 25, 2015
Messages
1,729
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
954
What do you think about A.I replacing real life women in the future as a companion? An A.I that could do anything you wanted. The A.I was programmed to act very human like and looked very human like. Would you ever consider having a relationship with an A.I you found to be more enjoyable to be around than a real women?

If it was human-like then it wouldn't do everything you wanted.

Plus if a man started to prefer robots over real women, he wouldn't be heterosexual any more. He'd be robosexual. He wouldn't be having sex either, it would still be a form of masturbation with a Fleshlight that can walk and talk.
 

five sounds

MyPeeSmellsLikeCoffee247
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
5,393
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
729
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Wtf why is it specifically a woman? Has nobody called this out?
 

Hapyniss

New member
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
110
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
2w3
If it was human-like then it wouldn't do everything you wanted.

Plus if a man started to prefer robots over real women, he wouldn't be heterosexual any more. He'd be robosexual. He wouldn't be having sex either, it would still be a form of masturbation with a Fleshlight that can walk and talk.

Let's just remember that it's still a man-based technology.
 

kyuuei

Emperor/Dictator
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
13,964
MBTI Type
enfp
Enneagram
8
I think that it is bullshit that there is someone out there for everyone. There isn't. There is, if two people work hard, someone out there that the other can learn to be happy with.. and there are lots of fortunate instances where people are happy with each other without as much hard work involved. But. There isn't someone out there for everyone.

Idealistically speaking, it would be great for a lonely man to have someone/thing that, even if it is programmed for it, to care about them. It could be the difference between the day feeling like garbage, and the day going okay. I could see a person that has lost their wife, can't bring themselves to be with a human person but can somehow forgive themselves for moving on if it's with a robot. It'd be nice to see people who need some sitting/nurturing (like those with dementia) to have a robot capable of being with them, caring for them and about them at all hours of the day versus family members being totally stressed out at work wondering if their loved ones are okay. People who live alone might be able to have a robot to help them to the car or call an ambulance instead of being on the floor for 3 days. Something that isn't human caring about you isn't such a bad thing.

... Alternatively, I see some darker aspects.. very dark aspects. We already have a grave problem of people treating the opposite sex like complete garbage.. add in an AI that literally has no capacity to care how they're treated? Not going to further humanity's progress in the whole "lets learn to get along with each other" thing. It'd be interesting to see the first, "I swear I thought s/he was an AI I didn't know I was raping a human" case.

And really.. the men that truly seem to desire AI's the most right now are those that honestly don't seem to want to get along with women. They don't just 'don't get it'.. they don't want to get it. They don't want to own up to their own responsibilities in society. They don't want to see things from other peoples' eyes, they want people to just see through theirs. "Oh no, women just don't like me." That's not womens' fault. That's your fault. "I don't want to change who I am" well if who you are is a miserable sack of shit, then no wonder. "Women just nag me constantly about playing video games" Probably for a fuckin' reason. Don't like it? There's some really amazing sex toys out there that can make humanity obsolete if you truly like your bachelor-selfish-lifestyle more than a relationship. No one's forcing you to get a relationship. No one's demanding you have one. So don't. But don't expect other people to spend serious time, research, and money creating a new more mindless female just so that you can get your rocks off between WoW raids. There's female parts already being machine crafted to such a perfection that they can mimic actual porn star body parts. Why ask for a whole robot capable of catering to your "I want a woman to treat me like my mother but with sex" fantasy.

Overall, I think AI's would be beneficial to humanity, but won't replace humanity so I'm not too worried. I just hope humanity keeps progressing forward.. and truly, the douches that want these just so they can hole up in their apartments and hide from the world and contributing to it will do so with or without AIs.
 

violet_crown

Active member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
4,959
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
853
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp

On the real, though. I'm actually for it. If some robot pussy is all that some of the most vocally misogynistic assholes out there need to calm their shit down and have an actual object to treat like an object, rather than a person, then why not? They'll fuck their robots, and effectively ensure that a whole swathe of the male population that would share their disposition in the future either through nature or nurture, will never be born.

In 50 years, the last of the man children will die out, and the men who will have survived the purging will presumably be the ones best suited to the new feminist utopia (and/or Garden of Femmedom, I'm open to either). This is basically the strategy that was used in that one Rick and Morty episode, anyways.


I'm here if you need to talk, you guys. :)
 

chubber

failed poetry slam career
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
4,413
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
On the real, though. I'm actually for it. If some robot pussy is all that some of the most vocally misogynistic assholes out there need to calm their shit down and have an actual object to treat like an object, rather than a person, then why not? They'll fuck their robots, and effectively ensure that a whole swathe of the male population that would share their disposition in the future either through nature or nurture, will never be born.

In 50 years, the last of the man children will die out, and the men who will have survived the purging will presumably be the ones best suited to the new feminist utopia (and/or Garden of Femmedom, I'm open to either). This is basically the strategy that was used in that one Rick and Morty episode, anyways.

I'm here if you need to talk, you guys. :)

That's not good for diversification, which is what genetics need to survive in the long run. :drwho:
 

Hapyniss

New member
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
110
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
2w3
Wtf why is it specifically a woman? Has nobody called this out?

Because of the two genders - men don't seem to mind being able to program their exact needs into a machine that *performs* without all that emotional gushy crap. Besides, dial up your dildo and then start pointing fingers. It's not like women haven't been using machines themselves. (Also created by men so it's *easier and woman can do it themselves*) Hypocritical. Men just think about having one machine that does everything they want.
 

chubber

failed poetry slam career
Joined
Oct 18, 2013
Messages
4,413
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Because of the two genders - men don't seem to mind being able to program their exact needs into a machine that *performs* without all that emotional gushy crap. Besides, dial up your dildo and then start pointing fingers. It's not like women haven't been using machines themselves. (Also created by men so it's *easier and woman can do it themselves*) Hypocritical. Men just think about having one machine that does everything they want.

Yes, everything we want.

 

five sounds

MyPeeSmellsLikeCoffee247
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
5,393
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
729
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Because of the two genders - men don't seem to mind being able to program their exact needs into a machine that *performs* without all that emotional gushy crap. Besides, dial up your dildo and then start pointing fingers. It's not like women haven't been using machines themselves. (Also created by men so it's *easier and woman can do it themselves*) Hypocritical. Men just think about having one machine that does everything they want.

I think that's a pretty sexist way to view the difference between men and women tbh. All men want a programmable servant? All women want gushy feelings? And if no men want that (and everyone is heterosexual as is implied here) then what women will ever be satisfied by a man who just wants someone to suck his dick and do things a computer can do? Certainly not an ushy gushy impossibly complicated woman.
 

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Because of the two genders - men don't seem to mind being able to program their exact needs into a machine that *performs* without all that emotional gushy crap. Besides, dial up your dildo and then start pointing fingers. It's not like women haven't been using machines themselves. (Also created by men so it's *easier and woman can do it themselves*) Hypocritical. Men just think about having one machine that does everything they want.

stereotypes don't do anyone a favor

I want a human, not a machine that does things at my request... a little backtalk in a light-hearted manner is fun, after all ;)

(plus... if you think about it, real penises are hilarious and strange things... they can move seemingly on their own! they can retreat along with their ball friends when it gets cold or something especially terrible has been seen, they can twitch and their skin is super stretchy... penises are like interactive toys that enjoy being played with! :holy: )
 

Hapyniss

New member
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
110
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
2w3
[MENTION=7278]jixmixfix[/MENTION]

I think that's a pretty sexist way to view the difference between men and women tbh. All men want a programmable servant? All women want gushy feelings? And if no men want that (and everyone is heterosexual as is implied here) then what women will ever be satisfied by a man who just wants someone to suck his dick and do things a computer can do? Certainly not an ushy gushy impossibly complicated woman.

Exactly - you answered your own question. I don't think you understand that it is exactly what we're touching on here. I wouldn't mind having a programmable servant to do all the things I wouldn't want to do and to do the things that I enjoy having from a relationship. I can create myself the perfect man and he'll do exactly what I say. There's seemingly an underlying vein against your value system given it's triggered a distaste for the response.

It's not sexist to point out there are obvious differences between men and women. Do you deny this? As flawed as it may be to YOU. Geez. Hop off that high horse. It's equally bias to spread ambiguity as the ONLY way to think and behave. I'm actually not required to include everyone when sharing my opinion. Even scientific research doesn't include everyone equally. There's always bias. And...as such...science takes this into account mathematically. BECAUSE EVEN SCIENCE RECOGNIZES HUMAN NATURE BIAS AS A REALITY!!!! But...I digress.

But perhaps, you've forgotten the OP question - What do you think about A.I replacing real life women in the future as a companion?Would you ever consider having a relationship with an A.I you found to be more enjoyable to be around than a real women?

Interesting that you didn't point out the sexism in the OP question, but my response that followed contextually. Why?


Not really implying that homosexual people want something different, but in fact, they do; don't they? They've consistently sought after what they've wanted through lobbying and equal rights movements; rightfully so. However, this is actually different than the historically acceptable social conventions. Conversely, many of them behave to fit the stereotype of what gay "looks" like, too; further perpetuating their differences. However, many of them complain of the same things and I've heard them (gay men) talk about A.I. as a future possibility. So rather than take to heart the implications of the word "different", understand that some of us use the word definitively.

As far as I've observed - regardless of sexual orientation - men and women do want different things from their relationships and interactions. The view of what love is within the relationship is different as well. People are ridiculously complicated. And studies don't suggest that all the participants in studies were straight. It's just men and what most of them answered. So it's fair to hypothesize that some of the men participating in studies to suggest what men want, are gay, etc.
 

five sounds

MyPeeSmellsLikeCoffee247
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
5,393
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
729
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
[MENTION=26190]Hapyniss[/MENTION] my first post on this thread was 100% only calling out the sexism in the OP. Then you responded, and I questioned your sexist defense of it.
 

Bush

cute lil war dog
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
5,182
Enneagram
3w4
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
It's not sexist to point out there are obvious differences between men and women. Do you deny this? As flawed as it may be to YOU. Geez. Hop off that high horse. It's equally bias to spread ambiguity as the ONLY way to think and behave. I'm actually not required to include everyone when sharing my opinion. Even scientific research doesn't include everyone equally. There's always bias. And...as such...science takes this into account mathematically. BECAUSE EVEN SCIENCE RECOGNIZES HUMAN NATURE BIAS AS A REALITY!!!! But...I digress.
Well. That sure was an interesting interpretation of what [MENTION=18819]five sounds[/MENTION] said.

Differences are obvious. Differences have been studied. Even the most obvious differences aren't absolute, black-and-white differences.

Yes, differences exist. But they're trends. They're correlations. They're "tend to's."

I don't see how pointing that out denies human nature.
As far as I've observed - regardless of sexual orientation - men and women do want different things from their relationships and interactions. The view of what love is within the relationship is different as well. People are ridiculously complicated. And studies don't suggest that all the participants in studies were straight. It's just men and what most of them answered. So it's fair to hypothesize that some of the men participating in studies to suggest what men want, are gay, etc.
Any psychological study worth its salt would record information like this about respondents and either control for it or otherwise address it. That's Design of Experiments 101.
 

jixmixfix

Permabanned
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
4,278
i would say that most women want a programmable servant which is much harder to programme and men just want something that looks good to have sex with and possibly make them a few sandwitches here and there :D
 

jixmixfix

Permabanned
Joined
Jun 21, 2009
Messages
4,278
I think that's a pretty sexist way to view the difference between men and women tbh. All men want a programmable servant? All women want gushy feelings? And if no men want that (and everyone is heterosexual as is implied here) then what women will ever be satisfied by a man who just wants someone to suck his dick and do things a computer can do? Certainly not an ushy gushy impossibly complicated woman.

Sexist in what way? make your own thread about men no one is stopping you.
 

five sounds

MyPeeSmellsLikeCoffee247
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
5,393
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
729
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Sexist in what way? make your own thread about men no one is stopping you.

Could A.I. replace human companionship in the future?

There now all we need is one thread.
 
Top