There are some things that I asked myself, regarding the S or N question and here is what I came up with:
1) My primary love languages appear to be touch and acts of service rather than words.
Whose love language is really different ? Sex is an integral part of every relationship, if not the integral part that enables one to share closeness the most close way possible. I may be wrong on this and its only my bias but how could an affection toward words logically point one into a rather N inclined direction ? Intuition is about perceiving things in an abstract way, where you see the candlelight, the shadows it projects on the walls, the wax that has run over the table and feel the heat its emitting, whilst not seeing the candle at all.
I personally still havent made my mind up about if its just as easy to say sensors just concentrate on the physical things only and thats it, it is within every person a mixture of both perception ways, the tactile and the abstract and the ultimate decision which one primarily would be you can only be derived from the type as a whole; I do not believe its possible to say someone's a 100% sensor or vice versa, that's like saying a massive object has no shadow in the sunlight.
2) On the mindframes test, I scored as "sensitivity" which appears to describe an Sensing Feeling personality rather than an iNtuitive Feeler.
If you assume this, you assume at the same time that all intuitives are prone to insensitivity. I dont think that's how it works. This is what I think, regarding a sensual experience: as a sensor I think its important to you, to see and feel beauty through all your senses. So it will be a somewhat mandatory thing for a sensor that his spouse has huge boobs. Then again, in time he will learn eventually to value more abstract things. Like the way she moves, the way she behaves or the way she whispers dirty things into your ear. The combination of a long list of abstract things then, could be the one thing then that makes you say "I love this person". Of course to say someone who puts weight into appearance is a sensor and someone who does not is an intuitive would be wrong again, due to the mixture of both things in one person. But I wouldnt like it, if my partner was dirty and cultivated a female moustache that's where a strong sensor shines thru with me or thats just what society wanted me to believe ?!
3) I have a strong love of atmospheric films, and prefer a great deal of poetic sensory detail in literature which can override my need for analysis.
Me too, tho nothing can override my need for analysis *cough*
. But I am totally into cartoons or anime movies, a thing my girlfriend made me receptible too first, so I didnt came along it on my own. But I love it and nevertheless I am still convinced, I am no sensor.
4) I do seem to be somewhat more in touch with my body than some Ns, and don't feel as much of a divide between myself and sensing feelers in particular.
I think that's basically a F thing. All those NF sissies that put half-naked pictures of themselves in their user profiles, I mean really... A T just knows he is beautiful and doesnt need that
.
5) A lot of times I express emotion from a visceral level, like just crying and experiencing grief and letting it all out, then moving on ... or getting angry and getting over it, rather than stewing or dwelling or pondering how I should handle those emotions. I prefer the express it/move on way of living vs. mulling over bad feelings and stretching it out...
Again I see no connection to why this would make you a sensor or not. Since I am blind to the majority of my emotions, except for being drunk, I'ld like to passm on this question. ( Is "being drunk" an emotion at all btw ?
)
6) I have some sort of issue with people denying their more "animal" nature, and in fact love animals sometimes more than people, though that could just be an Fi value and not necessarily a sensor thing?
I have an issue with people wanting me to show an animal nature. But I think this is more of a T and F conflict again. The "F masters" as I like to call them, who appear to be completly blind to any form of reasoning, could be S's too, because they aint facilitated thru an abstract way of thinking to see alternatives to their own lifes or to become more wary of consequences to their actions.
Since I was raised 100 % freudian super-ego and only express my animalistic nature if I am enthusiastic about something or punch little kids in the face, I cant really say much about your thesis, but maybe S, maybe not.
7) An increasing impatience with formal education, a type of ADD, and resistence against anything too analytically dry and theoretical that doesn't relate directly to people...though that last part could just be NF vs. NT, right?
The same problem has my girlfriend and I start to experience it with age aswell. If you're going with huge steps towards 30 you're sick of sitting in school. Tho I am still into reading lnegthy text about all sorts of things that interest me and I guess that wont ever change.
My girlfriend got diagnosed ADD too, what isnt easy to get diagnosed with in Germany. Meaning it's not a common diagnosis because most doctors dont know about it or think its bullshit, I dont know. She tho made a test with her counsellor and got diagnosed heavy ADD. She always listens to music on earphones, when she goes out, cause she says that she experiences all phenomena around her simoultaneously and cant filter em properly.
According to this, I have been thinking too if she may be a S. She never got much into mbti, cause she doesnt believe in it, but the one time I after heavy trieing
made her take the test, she got infp. And according to all sfp type descriptions, I havent seen one that fits her at least 30 %.
So its hard to tell what her type would be.
---------------------
Well thats all I got, I know it doesnt say much, but that's because there is no finite answer in mbti things. If there were one, we wouldnt need all the talking.
Hope I could give you at least some new ideas thru my thoughts