Hi! What do you think of typing by microexpressions? I'm not convinced, but I don't know much about it so I might be completely wrong. Interested to hear your views.
Cognitive Typology
Cognitive Typology
It's an incomplete rip-off of Pod'Lair.Hi! What do you think of typing by microexpressions? I'm not convinced, but I don't know much about it so I might be completely wrong. Interested to hear your views.
Cognitive Typology
It's an incomplete rip-off of Pod'Lair.
Pod'Lair's reading system is the real deal as it allows to differentiate all dichotomies.
I'm sceptical about eye movements because they were clearly ripped off from Lenore Thompsons ideas about left brain and right brain, possible they weren't a part of the original system.And they got thrown out of the forum many years ago. Thank Christ. Or do you support "reading" the movement of each eyelash on the eyelid?
They typed Trump as ENTJ. Ha-ha I know it.
Theories & Wild Hypotheses
But the ENT isn’t all about enterprise; they will also be philosophers and thinkers that dive into the depths of the unknown. They will seek to understand the nature of this reality from the tiniest scale up to a cosmic scale. The ENT will theorize about the nature of the existence and become immersed in questions both metaphysical and scientific. From quantum physics to theology and psychology, the ENT will try to find the unseen threads tying all things together.
This proves that this typology is a load of bunk.They typed Trump as ENTJ. Ha-ha I know it.
This proves that this typology is a load of bunk.
This proves that this typology is a load of bunk.
This proves that this typology is a load of bunk.
Found this online:
Person#1: "Yeah totally agree, he's ESTP. He doesn't address *actual facts/issues in a logical manner and just insults people and makes fun of them. Not ENTJ behavior."
Person#2: "I think there should be a rule that if you think Trump is an ENTJ, you shouldn't be allowed to type people."
<smirk>
bla bla bla bla , any real argument?
CognitiveType has been the most accurate way of typing for me. It is falsifiable, it is objective, and Trump is an ENTJ. Deal with it.
In all seriousness, to me, CT has proven to be the most reliable method. Any kinks in the system, and corresponding mistypings, are corrected over time. Typing via visuals shouldn't be so taboo, but it is because of the highly subjective nature in past attempts by various persons. Ironic that is considered to be so subjective, when our involuntary expressions are likely the most objective ways to inform us of cognitive patterns that do not rely on evaluating the content of speech - the latter which we know to be extremely unreliable, and these forums are evidence of this.
If you have interest, I strongly suggest looking into the model. See if you can recognize these patterns for yourself, and if there is meaning in them.
No, I don’t think it’s a thing.
A lot of what determines a type is how/what we choose to express and the intensity of those expressions.
Micro-expressions are completely involuntary, it isn’t something we can train ourselves out of ( except maybe the hardest intelligence agents or poker players, eve; then I’m not sure) so, no, they aren’t valid for typing.