Fuck yeah, I knew it! I know exactly the kind of situation you're in... where you know you will sustain heavy losses if you try to save that person's base. IME, if that person got a drone/probe out, it's wiser to just have them rebuild if they were hit with a heavy rush.
How did you end up winning that one?
We should compose a group of starcraft players from this board.... but I'll be damned if we have any XNFPs on our team =) IMO, NTs and SJs usually make the best teamates.
They were 2 protoss and 2 zerg and we were 3 terrans and 1 protoss.
The thing is that they went to rush one terran. But they lost a fair amount of their army fighting his few marines and SCVs and with remaining troops they strated to destroy base infrastructure. But they were constantly sending reinforcements. I know that if we send our marines without medics and with that few zealots that the other guy had we will lose for sure. Plus their reinforcements will be coming from our back what will result with sandwich.
So instead we waited for medics and then I and protoss attacked their bases.
But combination medics+stimed marines+zealots can pawn everything they had at that stage because they placed everything they had in army and rush. But instead to destroy they entire base we were aimed only at nexuses and lairs and they didn't want to confront us with workers since what would be a suicide. So we destroyed only two structures but throw two of them out of the game. They could not attack us succesfully because we created a baricades at entrances. The other terran blocked the way to the protoss and himself since they share intrests and entrances. If they attacked they would suffer huge loses.
They probably expected that we will try to save him but instead our plan was somewhat counter intuitive and we hit where it hurts.
When it was 2vs3. the siege tanks come into play and ... (you know the drill)
They lost because they were not playing as a team and did not have plans.
This is a lot of self-flattery.
Antisocial One, surely you realize the inherent damage the purposeful reveal of such a position creates? Perhaps we are not your subjects.
In any case, I've found that those who wish to assert control over the peers are often those who feel the greatest emotional distance from them. The application of dominant will thusly functions as a confirmation of some internal suspicion of superiority.
Megalomania is a pop term used to describe latent inadequacy; a means to disavow lingering fear of failure or disruption of prized ability.
Mbah, only plan for other people when asked. I'm pretty good with train and bus schedules...otherwise I prefer to be free to do my own thing.
I don't know man, every new thread of yours seem blabbers on how awesome you are.
You two are right. There is some egocentricism in that post. I have opened his thread to see how other NTJ deal with this kind of thing.
There is a dogma that INTJ and ENTJ like to be incharge and plan things that others will do. So I have shown the most NTJ side of me to provide examples of stereotypical NTJ behavour from my life. That is why I have asked "can anyone relate?" few times. Some people took the thread it more light hearted way but topic is not a koke.
I am perfectly aware that admiting this kind of behaviour to others can be quite bad for relations. Over the years I have managed to act more kindly to people but I can still hurt peoples feeling without too much effort if I am not careful. But huthing their feeling is not my goal.
ENTJ probably stand better in this kinds of things then INTJ because of E.
On the other hand I am forced into this. Since people want me do the planning and thinking. (I made a thread about this few month back).
if something need to be keept safe people usualy give it to me since I am the most reliable person in the group. I must pay attention to my perents bills since they forget to pay them from time to time. Many times people reject my idea because they don't want to change something. Most of this are qute trivial things. But they are suprised and approve when they see how good it works. (since I did it behind their back)
The only way that I can do things is by indirect ways or behind their back. Both ways lead to treating people like pawns or with disrespect.
One year when I was a kid no one was interested in throwing a Christmas tree out. So it stayed in the living room until May.
I have more stories that are similar to this one.
I am reised myself in a way that I can live in my environmemt and still have some progress. I know that it is arrogant to think that you are better, but in many cases life didn't prove me otherwise.
Does this make any sense?