Pionart
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 4,049
- MBTI Type
- NiFe
If INFP is one of the types that you're considering, then that's ok.
However, if you think I am definitely NOT an INFP, why?
It seems obvious because:
- I am a very quiet person who is kind and good maths and philosophy and psychology and things of that nature and also I am very laidback and if I am a type other than INFP then surely it has to be a type very similar to INFP because otherwise why would INFP seem like such an obvious choice?
It is quite bizarre if I am a different type, however definitely conceivable, now ISFP seems hard to imagine but possible and so too of ENFP, and if INFJ is truly the case then that seems really rather peculiar, and yeah.
Could an extrovert type seem so clearly like an introvert in real life that they are described as one of the quitest people that different people have ever met? I think yes, an extrovert could be like that because extroversion is perhaps correlated to verbosity however the correlation can oftentimes be gone against, and so an extrovert could obviously seem heavily introverted.
Now, could a sensing type seem to be so good at mathematics and philosophy and psychology when these are stereotypically N>T, N, N>F (?) Interests, specifically?
Now, what about T vs F... could a T seem so... disregarding of self? So focused on the effect being had on others rather than the consequences that they will face themself? It seems bizarre, unless I am like some Mastermind INTJ who is going super Fi or something as some long-range scheme... conceivable.
Now, P vs J... idk, could be either. I am super laidback calm go with the flow even if I am like dying inside omfg but yeah I can be organised but not super-organised, I guess Si auxiliary would seem the strangest in that case as they are the most Jish J's right? Well anyway, I don't even know who would seem themself as more Pish out of IJ and IP so I don't even know here but yeah EJ seems the strangest, not sure about the other dominant functions but yeah.
What do you think?
However, if you think I am definitely NOT an INFP, why?
It seems obvious because:
- I am a very quiet person who is kind and good maths and philosophy and psychology and things of that nature and also I am very laidback and if I am a type other than INFP then surely it has to be a type very similar to INFP because otherwise why would INFP seem like such an obvious choice?
It is quite bizarre if I am a different type, however definitely conceivable, now ISFP seems hard to imagine but possible and so too of ENFP, and if INFJ is truly the case then that seems really rather peculiar, and yeah.
Could an extrovert type seem so clearly like an introvert in real life that they are described as one of the quitest people that different people have ever met? I think yes, an extrovert could be like that because extroversion is perhaps correlated to verbosity however the correlation can oftentimes be gone against, and so an extrovert could obviously seem heavily introverted.
Now, could a sensing type seem to be so good at mathematics and philosophy and psychology when these are stereotypically N>T, N, N>F (?) Interests, specifically?
Now, what about T vs F... could a T seem so... disregarding of self? So focused on the effect being had on others rather than the consequences that they will face themself? It seems bizarre, unless I am like some Mastermind INTJ who is going super Fi or something as some long-range scheme... conceivable.
Now, P vs J... idk, could be either. I am super laidback calm go with the flow even if I am like dying inside omfg but yeah I can be organised but not super-organised, I guess Si auxiliary would seem the strangest in that case as they are the most Jish J's right? Well anyway, I don't even know who would seem themself as more Pish out of IJ and IP so I don't even know here but yeah EJ seems the strangest, not sure about the other dominant functions but yeah.
What do you think?