Yeah, what is up with that? Screw MSM again for missing the actual story.
You can already see the Corporate news media reporting on this different. Because he was a wealthy CEO its like he's a real person to them.
Yeah, I was skimming my FB feed this morning when the New York Times obit / coverage came through and I had to look -- LOTS of comments, but essentially it's pretty much 90% audience talking about how high profits came from screwing over customers, 5%
explicitly saying the guy was terrible / a villain because of this and doesn't deserve this attention, and 5% saying it sucks he was killed and he was answerable to stakeholders but again this is just showing how complicit the entire health care industry is to profit and is not customer-focused.
One number I saw thrown around was that United Health denied close to 23% of its claims, which is a high mark among insurers.
I have never seen such a one-sided response to an obit, and there was such variety in the wording and interactions that I don't think there were many bots. It felt like a pretty active message board, like here in its heyday.
There were a number of "thoughts and prayers" comments made sarcastically, including one gem about how "thoughts and prayers were not medically justifiable and thus not approved."