I don't know who needs to hear this but the stock market is not the economy. There is no correlation between the market and GDP.
I don't know who needs to hear this but the stock market is not the economy. There is no correlation between the market and GDP.
This is one thing my grandpa brings up correctly - he says the stock market has nothing to do with the real health of the economy, and a good hunk of it is a game of risk anyway that has a lot of fraud correlated to it...
When I saw that vid in my feed I was like - do I have to?
Here is where I have to kinda object, just if you don't like your system that doesn't mean you are one of those that where the most iconic enemies of that system. It can be but there are alternatives.
In other words you can be generally against uncontrolled laissez-faire without going far to the left. Although in English speaking countries that is kinda controversial position: Anti laissez-faire centrism or right wing. Therefore how does that work ? In the name of our national sovereignty, Christian values, personal freedoms and well being of our people we demand that access to healthcare is declared a human right, that big foreign corporations don't have all the say here, that water supply remains common good and that education costs little (Since stupid/ignorant people can't really be independent).
This is just food for thought.
The reason the system doesn't work is because we have never been the United States in any real sense. The guiding principles of this country were drafted by property-owning, wealthy Englishmen who believed in rights for only themselves and everyone else who was exactly like them. Now, as we've become more diverse in every way imaginable, i.e. religious affiliation, racial / ethnic background, regional disparities, cultural mores, urban vs. rural - the country has become hopelessly fractured by petty ideological skirmishes, ongoing police brutality, increasing militarization, ghettoization / gentrification, underemployment / unemployment, an ever-widening wealth gap and a crumbling social security framework. The things you mention, like the right to healthcare and a low-cost education, a reliable water supply, etc. might be par for the course, something everybody in your own country can agree on (you're from Europe, I take it?) but that just isn't the case here, and frankly, never was. The U.S. was always, and still is, an oligarchy set up to benefit the rich and powerful. The rest of us have to work damned hard to have even a few meager crumbs of that pie. The people who get a tiny sliver of the pie (bourgeoisie) outright hate the people getting just crumbs, and feel like we should merely be grateful for the crumbs. And since our wages are in the toilet, you're dealing with a primarily debt-based economy here. The GDP is high, but that's an artificial measure of prosperity. Sorry to wreck your view of the U.S., but we are pretty much irretrievably broken as a country and on the verge of a second Civil War. The signs of collapse are made even more apparent during the coronavirus pandemic, with people such as my sister unable to receive unemployment benefits, even when the school she taught at closed its doors due to lack of funding / budgetary concerns. When I hear of people who are able to get on unemployment / "the dole," I almost can't believe how they managed to do it. Freelancers / the self-employed, like myself, have even less economic stability. I live in constant fear of having my low-cost healthcare coverage / "Obamacare" (a little over a $100 a month) stripped from me by this vile administration. (Note: I'm not exactly applauding Obama, because he imposed a stiff penalty in the form of a fine for those who didn't obtain coverage under the Affordable Care Act, which penalized a lot of people who were simply unable to find the correct coverage in their state from an insurance company that met their health needs and was actually, you know, affordable.) To pay for a routine doctor visit (annual wellness exam) out of pocket (without health insurance) can be astronomical, to say nothing of seeing a specialist or requiring certain treatments. I'm thankfully young and in very good health, but what if I got cancer? A scary prospect. Most people's consumer debt / bankruptcies here are due to outrageous, unexpected medical costs for treating conditions like cancer, which none of us can exactly predict. We aren't all out here buying Hermes bags.
P.S. In regards to big, foreign corporations, China has us by the balls. Time to settle up with them and move manufacturing back to the U.S. But there'd be no more Walmart (and I say good riddance).
I suppose it would be considered "decriminalizing" but saying you can either pay $100 fines or go to a free treatment center is not really complete decriminalization. I think it'd be an interesting project, albeit, I wonder how it would work. Do they go to prison anyway for not paying the fines and ignoring any and all help like some addicts do?
For others, perhaps it could be a road to seeking recovery without too much shame. I think it'd be interesting to see the future data on this type of thing.
The point is not about recovery. The point is for it to no longer be a criminal act. Why would drug use EVER be a crime? Especially the way illegal drugs are classified, it's not equal across the board. So just like the 18th amendment was one of the stupidest things this country has ever done, it only ended up empowering organized crime, drugs need to be decriminalized.
We do not need one more person in prison or mandated rehab which is also jail, for drug use. But this needs to happen at the federal level so idiot states can't do continue their punitive punishment fetishes.
Losing the war on drugs.
It may sound like a radical concept even in one of the most progressive U.S. states — but countries including Portugal, the Netherlands and Switzerland have already decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs, according to the United Nations.
Portugal’s 2000 decriminalization brought no surge in drug use. Drug deaths fell while the number of people treated for drug addiction in the country rose 20% from 2001 to 2008 and then stabilized, Portuguese officials have said.
Good.
I had to sit through lots of "drug education" bullshit in elementary school in the 90s. Like somebody getting high (which is an especially attractive option for poor people that feel they have no future) was the biggest evil facing the world. Undoubtedly drug addiction is a bad thing, but that drug education shit did not work. Likely it was just culture war bullshit and a way of reacting against the dirty hippies. Naturally the people in favor of it probably admired Wall Street types who were doing loads of coke, but hey, at least it wasn't crack, right? Don't try and tell me that Donald Trump never did coke.