They're not remotely parallel.
For someone that's only seen the new movies, where should I start? DS9?
I haven't seen a whole lot of TNG episodes, but one of the few that I have seen had a line that's stuck with me even after ~20 years. The Enterprise comes upon a planet, deserted except for an elderly human couple. There's obviously something fishy going on, and at the end of the episode Picard confronts the husband...I was a big TNG nut starting in college when it came out, then soured on it because it was all a bit too pat and smug to me in hindsight even though I watched the entire run and there are a few episodes that stand out (like The Inner Light or the whole Worf/Duras plotline). Ensign Ro was a breath of fresh air.
What about upcoming stuff, though? JJ Abrams is in charge of both (he IS the guy who got the cake and ate it) and while I do favour Star Trek, just seeing the crashed Star Destroyer as a backdrop in the second teaser cemented in my very mind that I may be very blown away by the new film. Then again, it may just turn out again to be CGI swordfighting and Jim Henson.
The Star Wars expanded universe is interesting though (only because there had to be an expanded universe, to add more content?), I played Dark Forces (if they draw upon this for Rebel One, I would be impressed, especially if they namecheck Kyle Katarn) and the first two KOTOR games and I liked being immersed in that way. Is there only so far you can go with the Star Wars theme though, before you end up repeating yourself?
I haven't seen a whole lot of TNG episodes, but one of the few that I have seen had a line that's stuck with me even after ~20 years. The Enterprise comes upon a planet, deserted except for an elderly human couple. There's obviously something fishy going on, and at the end of the episode Picard confronts the husband...
...who turns out to be an alien entity of deific power. (Like Q, I guess, except not irritating.) The entity tells Picard his story: There was once a human colony on the planet. He came upon the colony, took human form, fell in love with one of the women, married her and then lived as a human for some time. But then the planet was invaded by some alien army, and in the mayhem his wife was killed. (What appeared to be his wife during the episode is merely an illusion.)
"In a moment of anger, I killed the aliens." The entity tells Picard. "And then out of remorse for what I'd done, I became a hermit here."
"Well you may have overreacted, but the invaders did kill your wife. Your rage and retribution are understandable." Picard replies.
"No," the entity replies. "You don't understand; I didn't just kill the invaders. I killed all of the aliens, everywhere."
I think Abrams has a better track record with his past work in connecting and emphasizing the humanity of his characters. his people tend to be people first, who are then layered with the trappings of the setting.
With Lucas, I always felt like it was just a little-kid director playing "Star Wars figures" with his toys, pushing them around and staging fights and smash-up battles. The more psychologically enduring elements in later movies seemed to come from other contributors.
Well, pretty much all stories are like that. What hasn't already been said? But you can change the details of the drama and the people involved. I think again this is a problem when you're focusing on the cosmetics ("Star-cruiser battles! Lightsaber battles! Force choking! Pod races!") and not as much when you focus first on characters and then toss them into a setting... because the main thrust of the story are the characters, not the trappings you already know.
If this is the case (well, I plan to go see The Force Awakens when it comes out) I'm hoping for something to reconnect me. Since 2005 I've been very 'meh' towards Star Wars.
I was kinda meh on Star Wars as soon as the prequels started coming out.
Playing the games was a totally immersive experience, though; the characters were more interesting, and the line between Jedi and Sith was more muddy.
We'll see what happens this fall. I'm actually a lot more sketchy on the third Star Trek movie due to all the [pre-]production problems that've had (ditching a director or two, redoing a script with only five weeks before production starting up, etc.)
Oh, I had no idea about that at all. I really hope the next one doesn't turn out to be a turkey. With the new films though, how would you feel about references to the future timeline (i.e. will we still have Picard etc), I've had my own ideas about that.
Yeah, those are my favorite games possibly of all time, and it's why I pick the world of Star Wars over Star Trek in general (although Lucas' own stories in his own world probably aren't quite as great as a few of the stories from the Star Trek world).
Maybe that's a better way to say it. I think in general Star Wars had more flavor and interesting world aspects to me, but Star Trek had some better storylines... until of course you look at the SWKOTOR line. I only finished a few of the class stories in the MMO SWTOR (which is kind of SWKOTOR 3), but it was the coolest thing ever and better than the movies... Nothing beat being a Sith marauder wielding two sabers and managing to survive the plots of everyone trying to destroy me as I rose through the chain (and a few masters) and managed to subvert the hope of the Jedi to being my thrall. Bwa ha ha.
I was a big TNG nut starting in college when it came out, then soured on it because it was all a bit too pat and smug to me in hindsight even though I watched the entire run and there are a few episodes that stand out (like The Inner Light or the whole Worf/Duras plotline). Ensign Ro was a breath of fresh air.
I struggled through a season of Voyager and quit, and never bothered with Enterprise.
What about upcoming stuff, though? JJ Abrams is in charge of both (he IS the guy who got the cake and ate it) and while I do favour Star Trek, just seeing the crashed Star Destroyer as a backdrop in the second teaser cemented in my very mind that I may be very blown away by the new film. Then again, it may just turn out again to be CGI swordfighting and Jim Henson.
The Star Wars expanded universe is interesting though (only because there had to be an expanded universe, to add more content?), I played Dark Forces (if they draw upon this for Rebel One, I would be impressed, especially if they namecheck Kyle Katarn) and the first two KOTOR games and I liked being immersed in that way. Is there only so far you can go with the Star Wars theme though, before you end up repeating yourself?
I don't mind it, but one thing i hate is when everything just becomes a rehash of whatever else was done. In fact, I think their overdoing it in the second ST is why there was such a pushback from the fan base.
...I'd actually think it would be kind of cool for them to attend a funeral for a Starfleet student named Picard who got stabbed to death in an impromptu bar fight. ("Tapestry", I think?) you know, like smaller references. Stephen King tends to have a better handle on this kind of stuff in his writing, since he often will tie his books together with little "drop-in" references .... side characters show up briefly in multiple books, or someone mentions something that happened in another book, etc. It gives more of a real feeling to the story without it all being on the nose.
For someone that's only seen the new movies, where should I start? DS9?
Star wars seems bit too much like a childish fantasy and i really dislike the athmosphere of the movies. Well made movies tho especially the old ones considering the equipment at the time.
Star trek is just meh.. I wouldnt say its crap, but i dont really care about it, i have seen some(maybe like 30 overall) episodes over the years. Thats just because as a kid there wasnt anything else on tv at the time it aired. I did see that some new movie with some Khan dude(title also had khan in it) and it was ptretty good, much better than what i expected from a trek movie. And yes i know saying that is blasphemy![]()