ImNoBozo
New member
- Joined
- May 29, 2015
- Messages
- 13
- MBTI Type
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 7w6
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/so
This is the most N-biased and self-serving post I've seen in a while. I'm pretty sure you're the one with a lack of depth right now if you're ruling out the idea of dating someone long term just because of a generalized profile.
People who employ type theory in their real lives to such an extent freak me out. I can't believe how easily some people forget type is ideally used for self-exploration and relationship growth, not a boyfriend checklist.
How much you wanna bet that Ni is actually Ti?
ACTUALLY, I'm extremely self aware with what I want, lack of depth? What a joke, I only pursue relationships I have deep amounts of chemistry with and mental connection with, I only have that occur with INTJs before I even know they're INTJ's. Being "lack of depth" is not being aware of your chemistry with other people, not being aware that you're clicking with them on a mental level. I just don't click with men who are sensors on a mental level, that's even before I know they're sensors. At least I'm completely honest and have said I would not do a long term relationship with him.
Get off your emotional know it all high horse, I think you're the one who lacks self awareness of mental connection with another person and whether or not you have "chemistry" with someone.