Militancy is judged by how much you push your atheism on others, or maybe by how hard you bite back when someone "attacks" your atheism. If you just let people believe what they want to believe, and if you don't get disproportionately hostile to criticism, odds are that you won't be considered atheist.Atheist.(scientific)
In the US people would probaly see me as militant atheist.
Militancy is judged by how much you push your atheism on others, or maybe by how hard you bite back when someone "attacks" your atheism.
Militancy is judged by how much you push your atheism on others, or maybe by how hard you bite back when someone "attacks" your atheism. If you just let people believe what they want to believe, and if you don't get disproportionately hostile to criticism, odds are that you won't be considered atheist.
Maybe we could call you a "devout" atheist?![]()
Seems to me the epithet 'militant atheist' is thrown at anyone who rejects religion, embraces rationalism, and upholds secularism.
I'm a traditional Catholic.
Except maybe Pandeism/Panentheism.
Evolution is also a pretty big part of whatever it is I believe.
But I like Buddhism best. Maybe one day. I generally believe a Dharmic way of thinking is most beneficial to humanity.
It's more philosophy than 'religion', but I'm just going with the thread.
Corrected. There's nothing about contrary to religion in rationality and secularity.
Many religionists starkly disagree with you, in both thought and deed.
Many religionists starkly disagree with you, in both thought and deed.