Who said anything about none adapting ?I am simply saying that surrendering to your own fears isn't really adapting (even if it feels that way). Especially since people who are under the influence of fear tend to make uncalculated moves that will probably have high cost. Also with this approach you basically lost this game in advance. Since in order to have real survival of the group you need 20 types of doctors, farmers, construction workers, engineers, teachers .... etc. Plus your group will surely be too small to have big enough gene pool to reproduce in a right way. So you have to start thinking about "strangers" sooner or later and the zeal should be left for the undead, unless there really is no alternative. So creating any sparks that could lead in this diection will almost surely be counter-productive, especially since the survivors will be obviously outnumbered. But ok I am not from the place were colonial lack of social structure in normal and where people go rogue just like that. (just for the record)
This made me laugh in a good way.You threaten the safety of my group .. I kill you
you look potentially sick or weak... I kill you
I see you causing trouble in the near future.. I kill you
the group allowed you to survive against my better judgment and now I'm right .. I hurt you (give them all the I TOLD you so, look because I sense this shit in people) .. I kill you
You continue to assume that I am operating from a place of fear, I am operating from an offensive standpoint.
Secondly you also assume I am interested the repopulation of this new savage world filled with flesh eating non humans .I'm not .. I'm not interesting in rebuilding, I'm interested in surviving
The voice of reason is always the first to go.. ask dale from WD.
Sounds like this is not your area of expertise perhaps another thread would be a better selection for you.
You threaten the safety of my group .. I kill you
you look potentially sick or weak... I kill you
I see you causing trouble in the near future.. I kill you
I agree with all of this.. I'm not saying that voice of reason means sucker.. I actually like your voice of reason in general , in the above mentioned circumstances and on TC.See, this is why the voice of reason always ends up being the leader they never cared to be - coz the real supposed leaders are doing the powergrab dickswinging thing@Abcdenfp if you think a voice of reason also means you re a sucker, you ll find yourself quickly dethroned. Just sayin' It tends to be leaders, those that are in the spot light and out of touch with their people, not the (wo)man behind the scenes who is tapped into the going ons in that group that gets to handle all the risk, ime. For that matter, smart leaders have such a person guard their back and keep them safe at all costs. Coz they know that due to their position, people wont tell them shit. Stupid ones find themselves in a ditch or fed to the zombies by an angry mob after ignoring their input.
This made me laugh in a good way.
I'm highly convinced of your commitment to your group, but I'm sure you won't be able to kill just like that. At least, at first.
I got Leader too. Other than managing the members, motivating them, the distribution of tasks, taking into consideration affinity, and deployment of plans, your group will sooner or later need a transition into an outsourcing arrangement if you want to match higher probabilies of survival and a low stress environment, and ultimately, you'll be doing this for the sake of your initial group. I am sure though, if the situation arises, and you can trust your gut feeling, then you will be glad to make allies and expand your group.
The way you're describing your "gut feeling" and "instinct" and how you'll handle it if you handed your fate to someone who's lacking competency or doesn't "feel right" from your standing point, even if their decision seems rationally correct and safe, is something that can be overshadowed by other external voices who want to direct the action without proper council, and hugely frowned upon. Your reaction when you "feel" something is wrong, but others go against that gut feeling anyway, is anger and that "I told you so", "HA!", and you'd rather not make the other feel guilty which makes it hard for you to trust someone to lead, especially those who are unwilling to take calculated or even uncalculated risks. That's why I encourage my folks to come forward even if they're blindly relying on me.
I agree with all of this.. I'm not saying that voice of reason means sucker.. I actually like your voice of reason in general , in the above mentioned circumstances and on TC. It is the voice of reason that remains stuck in their old way of thinking and becomes inflexible that for me gets left behind or eaten or shot point blank because we don't have time to go down this morality road over and over again.
^^^ dittoTo be frank, if we d have to go over and over it again without progress, wasting time because you wont even discuss things and take the time they require for the good of all, ill usurp you myself. However, if you re is willing to take the time when needed to soundboard off of each other and figure out tough moral situations for the benefit of all without losing our humanity - im all in.
Watchdog
Your attention to detail and possible dependency on caffeine make you a watchdog. You're the first to volunteer to keep watch at night. You keep your group safe. In the off chance you do get tired, you manage to keep yourself awake through motivation or even pure willpower. Even when you're off duty, you like to keep a close eye on things.
![]()