Kingu Kurimuzon
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2013
- Messages
- 20,940
- MBTI Type
- I
- Enneagram
- 9w8
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
Voice of Reason
Stores would be mobbed with everyone else thinking the very same thing. I’d rather be as far from metropolitan/consumer areas as quickly as possible. I’d be good with my pre-purchased Walmart stuff.
*adds “machete†to next month’s shopping list*
That shark suit does sound cool in theory, but I’d wonder about upkeep. And if it’d be ok to sleep in/wear all the time. I don’t think zombies will wait for me to get dressed. I do like the idea of anti-bite clothing, though.
My sentiments exactly, I always get leader in these test as well, but I'm not interested in debating anything in the middle of an apocalypse or convincing anyone of anything either. Staying on the move is the smartest play , but having someone with you to look out assists a great deal as well, small group (4 persons max) with same objective works much better than on your own. IMO
I will watch the fog, I am always fascinated in how people think they will react and actually react and the dynamics of a group setting in general. I know no one would be my leader right away ... that would have to be earned as I am always skeptical of Someone who is too eager for that burden in a group dynamic , if a leader naturally emerges after proving them selves , they will. Earn my respect but ultimately I can't be in a group and not be a part of the crucial decision making, I trust my gut more than most people.That's why I wouldnt want to have a party or to actually be a leader, I'm always interested in how common it is that quizes like these spit out "leader", it makes me think, so, if all the people in the thread were this instant under siege would any of the leaders give way to the other leaders and allow someone to do that in order that everyone can take practical steps or would it all turn out like The Fog (the movie not the TV series) which actually is a great short film for anyone interested in things like leadership, different sorts of leaders, group dynamics and crisis management.
Actually I would be like carol from WD before she went soft .. so leaderish behavior (yes I know that is not a word)
My only concern would be for my own little group. I'm not looking into expanding.
You threaten the safety of my group .. I kill you
you look potentially sick or weak... I kill you
I see you causing trouble in the near future.. I kill you
the group allowed you to survive against my better judgment and now I'm right .. I hurt you (give them all the I TOLD you so, look because I sense this shit in people) .. I kill you
but my main objective is to survive .. a new standard of what I deem good or bad would be set internally. I'm not really interested in debating these standards.
Watchdog
View attachment 19405
Your attention to detail and possible dependency on caffeine make you a watchdog. You're the first to volunteer to keep watch at night. You keep your group safe. In the off chance you do get tired, you manage to keep yourself awake through motivation or even pure willpower. Even when you're off duty, you like to keep a close eye on things.
Well, I wouldn't say that I am "focused" on killing I am just giving the scenarios where I would not hesitate to kill Someone for the safety of the group. I would have to seriously trust someone in order to allow them to make decisions for me in circumstances listed above and he/she decided not to kill these people. Basically if you are gonna be the voice of reason in any of those scenarios and one of my group members dies... I'm holding you responsible and I distrust your instincts. Which in apocalypse time you have to rely on more than usual. It's the land of the hunter or the hunted.Yes, but the people that have too much focus on killing are actually the ones who have reduced chance of survival. Since they trigger everyone around them for the reasons that are named above. *voice of reason*
Well, I wouldn't say that I am "focused" on killing I am just giving the scenarios where I would not hesitate to kill Someone for the safety of the group. I would have to seriously trust someone in order to allow them to make decisions for me in circumstances listed above and he/she decided not to kill these people. Basically if you are gonna be the voice of reason in any of those scenarios and one of my group members dies... I'm holding you responsible and I distrust your instincts. Which in apocalypse time you have to rely on more than usual. It's the land of the hunter or the hunted.
So much leaders. We are doomed.![]()
The ability to adapt will be a huge factor regarding who survives.You don't see yourself as the killer but doing this is exactly what may trigger others around you. What you think may not even matter since for them you crossed the same line that you made for yourself. Also as you pointed out yourself: it is Apocalypse out there and rules are gone, so it better not to be too hasty. Since the bullet can come from any hand once the shooting starts.
The ability to adapt will be a huge factor regarding who survives.
The rules will change, people will show you exactly how ugly they can be, if you are not prepared to read the changing landscape of humanity you won't stand a chance. I'm not hasty I'm territorial and I trust no one outside of my group immediately. You want to give people the chance to prove me right .. go for it.. but not at the detriment of my group. I won't allow it.
im not going out looking for people to take out or take what is theirs I am simply willing to protect what is mine.