HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I didn't see it but I do love me some hilariously awful movies.
![]()
I liked nothing about this film. The direction is terrible. The script is terrible. The acting is terrible. The music is fucking baffling. Lord this film is cheesy. A pain to watch.
I thought Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was the third best.
They rank as follows:
People seem to have forgotten how campy the other films were.
- Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
- Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
- Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
- Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
I thought Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was the third best.
They rank as follows:
People seem to have forgotten how campy the other films were.
- Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
- Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
- Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
- Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
People seem to have forgotten how campy the other films were.
Sacreligious! Watch Raiders then Crusade. The Last Crusade is by far the better film, It's beautifully with a cracking script, whereas Raiders is just a lot of fun. ('though Karen Allen is hot).
This isn't up for debate.
The trouble with Crystal Skull is that it hasn't any quotable lines, or dazzling moments, or surprises, or action sequences that young or old wouldn't mind watching over and over again. Think the Nepal barfight from Raiders; it's the finest scene of its category in film history.
I know that Lucas and Spielberg are hit-or-miss these days. But when I learned that Michael Kahn edited, I accepted that each of these men needs to retire.
The trouble with Crystal Skull is that it hasn't any quotable lines, or dazzling moments, or surprises, or action sequences that young or old wouldn't mind watching over and over again. Think the Nepal barfight from Raiders; it's the finest scene of its category in film history.
I know that Lucas and Spielberg are hit-or-miss these days. But when I learned that Michael Kahn edited, I accepted that each of these men needs to retire.
I think the motorcycle chase in Crystal Skull is the equal of pretty much any action sequence in any of the first three films. The difference is, again, that the first three have had time to become iconic in people's minds, and so the contest is rigged. It's just like how people reminisce about the "good old days", even if they're better off now.
I never cared much for Lucas, I always thought he was a hack that got lucky once with the first Star Wars film. But Spielberg (and by extension, Kahn) has made some exceptional films in recent years and I see no reason to put him out to pasture because there have been a few clunkers. It's only because he's trying to live up to "70s and 80s Spielberg" that the current Spielberg suffers by comparison. Anyone else who had Spielberg's 90s and 00s filmography would be roundly praised.
Just as an experient, let's look at his recent work. I'm going to arbitrarily pick the last 15 years of his career, since I think Jurassic Park is what a lot of people see as his last great action movie.
Schindler's List
The Lost World
Amistad
Saving Private Ryan
AI: Artificial Intelligence
Minority Report
Catch Me If You Can
The Terminal
War Of The Worlds
Munich
Indiana Jones And The Crystal Skull
In that list are a Best Picture winner (Schindler's List) and two other Best Picture nominees (Saving Private Ryan and Munich). Note that the nomination of Munich was as recent as 2005. I'd say that all on the list are at the least above average, and all but three (Lost World, AI, The Terminal) were widely praised upon their release.
Again, any other director with this filmography would be considered among the best. A director that might be past his peak can still make some amazing films, and Spielberg has. Just cause he's not batting a thousand anymore doesn't mean he's done.
Edited to expand my film nerd rant![]()