Was That Really Me?

[greenfairy]

Just got this book (Was That Really Me? by Naomi L. Quenk), about inferior functions. It seems like the more I read about typology the more confused I become. I'm not sure about INFJ at all; I fit all the INXX types about equally well. So whatever. I'm still this type for the public; but we'll see if reading about all the inferior functions and the rest of the book yields any new insight. I doubt it will, and I'll just have a type for the purpose of the website. Typology is probably mostly BS.

(And yeah, I've been on here slightly more than once a week, but whatever.)

 

[Magic Poriferan]

There is a theoretical basis for typology to not be BS that is rarely maintained. For what little it's worth, I can tell you that when you start examining the MBTI outside of the primary and auxiliary processes, it moves significantly further to the BS side.