I mean I wouldnt mind being an ISTJ- whatever type I am overall Im just me. Ive just honestly never been girly or bossy. If anything Im the opposite of both of those things irl. Always been a tomboy and have always been pretty passive, non-confrontational, and felt that people should be free to do things their own way.
Also Im not sure how you can even be more than 1 type. Tbh it doesnt really make sense, development of tert function sure- a complete change in cognitive stacking- just... eh. Idk if I believe thats possible.
Actually, it does make sense... Reinforcing [MENTION=20044]chubber[/MENTION] .
One is not necessarily can introvert or extravert, but can be an ambivert.
Function-speaking, one might lack aux. or lack any preference for a function.
This is considered as existent in Jung terms (the explanation is long) and with data (in general, all dimensions tends towards a normal distribution). When you get to the tests, only something like 10-20% of people are "clear" in all 4 dimensions. In my Jungian typology test, only something around 30% got a type with primary, secondary and attitude type. Taking into account the enneagram x MBTI combo and a bit of Big 5, I believe that only about 40% of people are more or less a good fit into a MBTI type (aka have a Big 5 score that is relatively similar & have an enneagram that is a common combo).
As [MENTION=40271]mancino[/MENTION] said privately, things are more of a continuum which 'we' split into discreet categories - 'we' categorize a bunch of different things into a single line - like logical, reasonable, etc.. on thinking for example. But things are more nuanced and they are more of a continuum - there is not really a clear point where one type ends and the other starts, with a good bunch of people in-between.
at least now I know what to ask for from a therapist, since it is well known. And treatable.
