I see ENTJs as head sheep of the flock.![]()
I have such a dirty mind, reading into this sentence like your signature.
To the TS, yes, I do. It comes in Morse code blips and beeps, though - and I'm not fluent.
Well every flock needs an alpha sheep. lol
Yes, good point. (I was wondering whether to post about this.)I'm saying, do you see your type as 'the' type, and see other types as 'the others'? Do you fit your understanding of other types types to fit the mold of your type? -- Do the other types orbit around the INTP? And I don't mean it in a self-centered way. I am just asking how you understand each type.
Yes. I kind of see my type as being an ideal in terms of focusing on an abstract idea without trying to conform it to anything material. INTJs would be second, but I think Te makes them more likely to fall victim to the need to permanently ground part of it in (ugh) the tangible.
INFPs are an ideal in terms of being the most conscientious about what they consider good. But their ideals tend to oppose mine, thus we don't get along.
I see ENTJs as head sheep of the flock.![]()
No, when I first began to explore MBTI I found my results very upsetting. I saw it all as critical. I felt like it made me out to be some sad, pathetic person who would live their live out alone in their head, isolated from people, and die a crazy cat lady. (Of course, I would also test INTP & INFJ sometimes, so what does that say about my impression of those types also).
Who nomiated you? You expected everyone to follow you without question?
If you become the head sheep. I'll be the first to kill you.
wolfy said:I'm not biased to my type. I'm biased to myself.
Others are different to me in varying degrees. I'm my only reference point.