INtP 5w4 sx/sp
Christian agnostic, bulk of religious background in conservative/evangelical faith with focus on evocative worship
The bottom line: I'm human, I can believe and intuit certain things but I'll never "know" them in the rational sense. Bottom line from Christianity is "Love God, love others as you love yourself," and we can argue about the rest until we're blue in the face and yet none of us can ever be an established authority on what is True vs theorized/doctrinized. Hence, my fallback into the "base conceptual framework of the faith" -- the attitudes and behaviors by which I try to treat others and myself and engage the Divine.... and my openness to other ways of thinking based on the natural outcome of those attitudes.
If there is a "judgment," the closest approximate of my beliefs is CS Lewis' "The Last Battle," where it's not about what beliefs you can articulate or what you outwardly profess, it's about -- when faced with Truth and the Divine -- whether you run from it out of fear and hate or step forward to embrace it out of love and desire (even if you're scared). Tash and Aslan are just names; one's moral nature by any name is still the same.
I think corporate engagement (such as a worship service) is powerful and useful, especially if the Divine is relational in nature and the faith communal, but I find most of the nuance of my spiritual growth has either occurred in solitude or else in one-on-one relationships to which I was deeply committed and willing to endure change for.
My faith was extremely intellectual when younger (it consisted of the memorization and study of holy books and commentaries, being able to articulate what they said, and arguing the points with others who disagreed); nowadays I don't have a lot of patience for that and am far more focused on my interactions with others and natural outcomes of different behaviors.
The biggest this is that revelation-based faiths (to be accepted on authority) can't serve as a foundation for me personally, I am very unstable because I can find no "rational" basis to undergird it all and thus have to take it on authority... and can't. I actually observe what works and what doesn't work, what leads to the best long-term outcomes, and compare that with my theoretical understanding and see how it lines up.
To me, this all seems to fit pretty well within an N-styled INTP framework -- lots of exploring, lots of openness, early rational (versus emotional or relational) approach, the actual beliefs have to be supportable in rational ways rather than just accepted from an authority.