The move towards integration or disintegration is core to enneagram theory. It isn't just a map of the human condition of each type. It includes what the architects consider to be a map of how each type fits into their perceptions of a well functioning society. This means there will need to be a standarisation of each type and how that type must move in order to fit into their model of a well-functioning society.
The above fails in that the human condition can't be categorised into solely individuals who fit into the 9 types. Maybe some fit into each mould. But there are many who will bridge types, whereby their bridging will require an amended version of how they choose to self-actualise to optimum health levels. Now how this fits into the enneagram model of a well-functioning society, I could honestly care less.
Tons of errors here:
_Enneagram has not been built by an architect, it has benn discovered, like E=MC² or any sort of mathematc formula.
_Enneagram is not a categorizing system
_an enneatype is not a mould,
_what I said, is that to experience some characteristics of a type does'nt mean that you are of this type,
_it is not a model where you do your own mixture where you mix some ingredients from 3 types to call it your "tritype".
And above all, what people seem to say here is that enneagram operate like this:
3 centers: head, heart, instincts
Head: the type that you relate the most in the head triad
Heart: the type that you relate the most in the heart triad
Instincts: the type that you relate the most in the instinctive triad
But it does'nt work like that at all, the operation is
Head: the mental fixation of your type
Heart: the passion of you type
Intincts: subtypes
So, everyone who relates on the tritype theory is totally wrong.