Virtual ghost
Complex paradigm
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2008
- Messages
- 22,151
On this we can agree. After all, the definition of conservative is an aversion to change or innovation.Here I kinda have to disagree, the more radical of them may share some things with Fascists but I just don't see it that way. These people seem to be way too individualistic and market focused to be fascists. As I said for me this is some kind of a anarchy-business-theological hybrid, that evidently has it's roots in the wild west. You can do xenophobia and various forms of bigotry without being a fascists. Since fascism is much more than just that.
While the fact that this mix can be very toxic and harmful for many people is something else. As I said for me this isn't Conservative since it conserves pretty much nothing except some vague old ideas.
Tudor Dixon? Yeah she is that crazy. All the Michigan GOP gubernatorial candidates spew some level of this crazy on this and many other topics.
Is this true ? Is she really this crazy ? (I suppose that is rhetorical question)
On this we can agree. After all, the definition of conservative is an aversion to change or innovation.
Tudor Dixon? Yeah she is that crazy. All the Michigan GOP gubernatorial candidates spew some level of this crazy on this and many other topics.
I don't think American fascism necessarily has to look identical to European fascism. Anyway a lot of them will throw out the worship of markets if a social issue gets involved; that is really more important to them. We've seen this recently in Florida. They support the government intervening in business if it's to assert a socially repressive agenda. That's fascism; they can't hide behind the libertarian label once they do this, and they have already started to cheer on this kind of thing.Here I kinda have to disagree, the more radical of them may share some things with Fascists but I just don't see it that way. These people seem to be way too individualistic and market focused to be fascists. As I said for me this is some kind of a anarchy-business-theological hybrid, that evidently has it's roots in the wild west. You can do xenophobia and various forms of bigotry without being a fascists. Since fascism is much more than just that.
While the fact that this mix can be very toxic and harmful for many people is something else. As I said for me this isn't Conservative since it conserves pretty much nothing except some vague old ideas.
I don't think American fascism necessarily has to look identical to European fascism. Anyway a lot of them will throw out the worship of markets if a social issue gets involved; that is really more important to them. We've seen this recently in Florida. They support the government intervening in business if it's to assert a socially repressive agenda. That's fascism; they can't hide behind the libertarian label once they do this, and they have already started to cheer on this kind of thing.
Which supports what Ceecee is saying, and is in line with my belief that I've just been subject to a long string of gaslighting since 2003 or 4 to try and convince me that American conservatism is something different from fascism. I don't see you as participating in that, just as you being an outsider trying to make sense of the system.
Americans that should know better but want to appear open-minded or enlightened, or just like hanging out with their buds on the other side for whatever reason, are a different story. I don't need any of their analysis of the political right in this country, or determination of who the good and bad conservatives are. The determination these people make of who the good and bad conservatives are is mostly just determined by whether or not they went to college.... if the conservative went to college and can talk like a college educated person, they are good! They support the exact same policies and are actually be much better at making cases for them, which I would think would make them bigger threats, but hey, at least they don't talk like a redneck or mouthbreathing troll.
We do love our buzz words. Studies show that 9/10 Americans respond positively to advertising. It's sort of how we take bigh complicated boring droney things like politics and infuse them with sports sparkle shinies our marketing department would like us to call "Zazz". We're also big on Slogans. You would not believe the things we'll get behind if it's a catchy slogan. And if you can fit it on a hat? forget about it, shut up and take our democracy. We can always buy it back later right?I never said that this is good. But for the most part I don't think that Fascism is the right word there. I mean my argument is based purely on the matter of definitions. Especially since Americans have learned to throw around words like Nazi or Communists without fully grasping the details of both concepts.
I never said that this is good. But for the most part I don't think that Fascism is the right word there. I mean my argument is based purely on the matter of definitions. Especially since Americans have learned to throw around words like Nazi or Communists without fully grasping the details of both concepts.
Regardless of the look, it should never be in fashion.I just think fascism looks a little different depending on the context.
I just think fascism looks a little different depending on the context. I get what you are saying, though. I just am not sure it's an important distinction to make.
You are right that the categories and labels aren't the top problem here. The top question is how to quiet down all this "toxic passion".
make it less profitable to corporate interests?