• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Random Movie Thoughts Thread

Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Need. Need this.​
I love atmospheric horror like this.

Speaking of horror, I forgot to mention Fallen(1998) in my list of Philadelphia films I've seen. It's even got James Gandolfini.

There are many more films I'm thinking of now, so maybe it would be better to say "I'm from Philadelphia, and I haven't seen the Rocky movies or Shazaam."
 
Last edited:

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,414
I love atmospheric horror like this.

Speaking of horror, I forgot to mention Fallen(1998) in my list of Philadelphia films I've seen. It's even got James Gandolfini.

There are many more films I'm thinking of now, so maybe it would be better to say "I'm from Philadelphia, and I haven't seen the Rocky movies or Shazaam."
This and the Watchers are the ones I'm excited about. If there's even a sniff of Fae, or folklore aesthetics...You would have to try really hard to get me to not be favorably disposed towards it. Kinda like how crime noir has to be shoot em up for me to turn it off. How did they fuck up that movie you might ask? They got greedy. Can you script a gunfight during a fuck scene. Yes. But it cheapens both to do so. You're already asking for a lot of suspension of disbelief with the carrot scene, and Paul Giamatti going necrophile on a dead body whilst he tells his wife the business trip is gonna be a bit longer than he's planned.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,174
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
1000005487.jpg
 

SensEye

Active member
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
882
MBTI Type
INTp
I can't tell if this looks good or bad.
Seems like a throwback to the original.

I almost never go out to a theatre these days (I just wait for the video release), but this one might have potential.. I'll wait for the reviews to come out. If they are overwhelmingly positive I might just get get motivated to get off the couch. Same can be said of the Furiosa prequel.

Don't see anything else in the summer release schedule that seems theatre worthy (to me) at first glance. Not to say some of the other releases don't have any interest, but only special effects driven action movies merit the hassle of a trip to an overpriced theatre IMO.
 
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
22,429
MBTI Type
EVIL
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Seems like a throwback to the original.

I almost never go out to a theatre these days (I just wait for the video release), but this one might have potential.. I'll wait for the reviews to come out. If they are overwhelmingly positive I might just get get motivated to get off the couch. Same can be said of the Furiosa prequel.

Don't see anything else in the summer release schedule that seems theatre worthy (to me) at first glance. Not to say some of the other releases don't have any interest, but only special effects driven action movies merit the hassle of a trip to an overpriced theatre IMO.
Furiosa I would definitely go see in theaters. I was skeptical of Fury Road and so I didn't watch it in theaters, but then I watched it on streaming or cable and it turned out to be quite satisfying.

I think because of my ambivalence I have to wait for reviews about Alien: Romulus.
 

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,414
This is one of the funniest scenes to me.
I crack up when other people crack up so I can't resist.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,174
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
So I rewatch Interstellar every so often, because I love the feels, the cinematography, and the soundtrack.

As I noted before, I think plot climax (the tesseract) is the weakest point, as well as Brandt's explanation of love, because it doesn't really spell things out clearly and because it still seems unbelievable that complex data could be transmitted by Morse Code manually. As I noted in the past, the idea of "love being quantifiable" isn't explained well; but in this case, it allows Cooper's relationship with Murph to inform him of the specific moments in the past where she is susceptible to receiving the data transmission + knowing what medium(s) would be relevant enough to her that she would be looking for it. This is where "love" can be quantified, where you have specific knowledge of the other person that others (without a relationship with said person) would not have; it informs you of the when, where, and how to best communicate with them.

Another thing I had noted in recent viewings is why Brandt seems so stupid on Miller's planet in regard to ignoring the waves. If you listen and watch carefully in terms of positioning, the reality is that when she starts heading for the wreckage, she doesn't yet recognize the ridge in the distance is a wave -- and then she DOES recognize it, but she is focused on that wave and just looking forward. Cooper is looking at that wave with her through the front windshield of the craft .... but he then realizes they might be in a swell, and goes to the BACK of the craft to look -- and sees the huge wave sneaking up on them from behind. The dangerous wave is approaching their position from behind. Despite Cooper's shouting, Brandt is confused and still focused on the front wave that is receding. She doesn't see the other wave until she turns and becomes trapped in the wreckage. So it was a simple positioning error on her part, too focused on what was literally in front of her, versus dismissing danger out of hand.

To be honest, Doyle makes the worst mistake here: He is too much a scientist in his own head and he pauses too many times to look at the wave, watching after Brandt's rescue, waits for the others to go on the craft first. He wastes a number of seconds LOOKING at things around him. Being an observer is great when you are a scientist. It is not great when you are in the field and there is danger to deal with. If he had headed back to the ship right after sending CASE after Brandt and not wasted time looking at the wave repeatedly, he would have survived. This is where people of action might succeed where observers fail.

I think there is also the parallel of Mann and Brandt -- when Amanda is the only one left, she realizes her situation is now like that of Mann's. She is going to an isolated planet that she hopes will be habitable (though she isn't totally sure), and she will likely died alone there, until the human seedlings come to fruition at least. Unlike Mann, she's accepted this is where she's stuck and will do her job to the end.

I don't know if Mann's exile rattled his brain. He should have certainly realized the threat of explosive decompression without a proper seal. It does set up one of the coolest scenes in the film, though.

I enjoy the humor in the film, including the banter between the mechs and Cooper, and also that whole introductory scene where Cooper has to meet with the school administrator and teacher. The administrator knows Cooper, and you can tell he's trying to be patient and kind of begging Cooper to let up a bit but has resigned himself to the talk going poorly; and the idealistic young teacher has no idea who she is dealing with when she asks him to reprimand Murph for getting into a fight over the authenticity of the Apollo missions. "There's a game tomorrow night, Murph's been going through a bit of a baseball phase. There'll be candy and soda and... well, I think I'll take her to that."
 

Red Herring

middle-class woman of a certain age
Joined
Jun 9, 2010
Messages
7,916
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx

The Cat

The Cat in the Tinfoil Hat..
Staff member
Joined
Oct 15, 2016
Messages
27,414
The existence of Siri and Alexa kinda turn Gerald's Game into a sinister fear based advertisement for a smart home.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,174
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I sure wouldnt mind a higher demand for more voice actors.​
I don't have anything against akwafina, really, but a little bit of her can go a long way. She was decent in The Farewell, and she can be funny in the proper dosage in comedies, but I don't know how she got to be the voice du jour of animation.

You know I'm a RWBY gushy fan girl, but one of the reasons that show is great is because of the professional voice actors. Frankly, they are all pretty stellar. They have all done a lot of things + their characters from show to show are different, it's their skill as voice actors and not some element of their voice they reused in EVERY SHOW that got them hired. It's funny because some of the core RWBY team actors (Ruby, Weiss, and Yang, I think) were all new to voice acting and often worked at RT in other capacities, but you can hear how they sunk into the roles by S3-S4 and really have it down now. Jen Taylor who plays Salem [the BBEG] was well worth whatever they paid her (she's known for a lot of stuff outside RWBY, including Halo, Mario, and the voice of Cortana for Windows 10-11). Her nuance is just spot-on in wringing every little bit complex emotion out of Salem.

I think some actors work well in animation despite not being primarily voice actors -- Jack Black is one. And there's some comedians who do well. But Akwafina is kind of a one-note schtick, it's like her annoying voice and high energy is the only thing about her in most of these roles. About the only other similar voice (animation work, has an annoying voice) I can think of is Gilbert Gottfried, but he had enough variety in his roles and/or they were established annoying characters (like Mr. Mxyzptlk) beforehand, and he was perfectly cast as Iago.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
52,174
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Starting to watch Brats on Hulu, where Andrew McCarthy is interviewing a bunch of his contemporaries who fell under the "Brat Pack" label. (I didn't realize until I was an adult that the term came from the older generation's crew of actors called the "Rat Pack.")

I was a bit younger than all of them except maybe Molly Ringwald (she and I were born with a year of each other), and McCarthy was never the one of interest to me, really. About the most interesting thing about him is that he and I share a birthday (he's 6 years older than myself). They all in fact seem to be about 6 years older (or so) than me, but I guess that was the point -- they were starring in films when I hit high school. Along with Molly, maybe John Cusack and Michael Anthony Hall are more my contemporaries (we could have all gone to high school together).

I'm only about 15 minutes into it, but I think the thing that sticks out most to me is how YOUNG they were when they all became very successful in their careers -- but they were also kind of typecast and then labeled with the Brat Pack name. At the time I wouldn't have realized it because they were six years older than me, they would have seemed like the cool college kids when I was a freshman in high school and old -- but looking at the footage now and having raised my own kids into their mid/late 20's, it's like, damn, they all look VERY young (22-23) and that's a lot to deal with when you're suddenly part of the cultural zeitgeist and you're barely established in your career. Kind of cool, kind of a heavy burden... and it also defines you to have that label slapped on you.

Now it's weird looking back. Not like they aren't successful and don't have money, but I would probably say only a few of them have had enduring careers -- maybe James Spader, Tom Cruise, Rob Lowe are the most successful overall? Demi Moore and Michael Anthony Hall did okay for a while, as did Michael J. Fox (who did better in TV overall until he had to stop). I'm not clear on how Emilio did over the years, he had a lot of movie roles into the 80's and then some of the 90's, but after that? Charlie Sheen also did well in films and TV for awhile, but his excesses eventually caught up with him -- I don't think either of them really established themselves as well as their father Martin Sheen had, as serious actors. I guess if you want to toss RDJr in there, he and Cruise might be the wealthiest of that crew, and RDJr like Cruise is still doing stellar work in film.

It's just interesting looking at it in hind sight. I definitely remember all the films coming out, there were such a slew of them in the category of "John Hughes" films. I guess I can throw Eric Stoltz in there too, and Lea Thompson. Mary Stuart Masterson is another who I could have gone to high school with. Stoltz has done a lot of bit parts over the years -- he's really good in those niche roles, but I'm not sure he would ever be listed among the greats, and I think Thompson and Masterson were also pretty talented in comparison to the others but I'm really not sure what they've done over the last 25 years or so since I don't watch network TV much.
 
Last edited:
Top