CitizenErased
Clean Slate
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2016
- Messages
- 552
I like most of the stuff that you mentioned. My favourite composers are generally Romantics. Wagner, Brahms, Beethoven, Rachmaninoff, Dvorak, Tchaikovsky, Mahler. I can't choose among them. My favourite works would probably be Beethoven's 9th symphony, Rachmaninoff's 2nd piano concerto, the requiems by Faure, Dvorak, and Brahms, Mahler's 5th, Tchaikovsky's Pathetique and Manfred Symphony.
My stories focus mostly on hope and despair (Cheesy. I know). I'm focusing most of my efforts on two novels which I will finish in the next five years or so.
One is a fantasy story, and it is an attempt at a sympathetic but critical examination of human nature achieved via a dive into the collective unconscious and a lost Arcadian golden age. It's about such things as the dissonance between the ideal and the real. Of tragedy and resignation, the dying world-heart, and the vigour of life.
The other is dystopian/sci-fi speculative fiction. It's about a future in which humanity's manifold attempts to obtain utopia have imploded. It's about collective disillusionment and collective learned helplessness. It's about a revival of humanity's fighting spirit, and its futile death throes in the face of impending apocalypse. Of bold desperation and fighting defiantly to the very end.
How about you? What are your stories about?
Dvorak's awesome too! For some reason I have trouble listening to Beethoven because it changes my mood to "the ugly side".
Nah, I don't think any topic is cheesy. The approach can be cheesy or not. You already know when you're going to finish your novels?! I've started more than five and they're all about 100 pages (but like at a quarter of the story). Going a bit on a tangent, I have some questions regarding the writing process:
a) Do you write the outline of the stories beforehand? I write it because when I come up with an idea for a novel, I see the story as a movie in my head, but in like 10 minutes, so I have to rush to the computer while making notes on a papaer before it goes away. And I'm very detailed about what I saw in my head, so my plot is something like "1 Title/1.1 Main character.... / 1.34.27 The tree of the sidewalk is a willow and is bent slightly to the right...", so I just write the novel on the same file, developing each bulletpoint. Obsessive, I know.
b) Do you skip parts or write it without "interruptions"? I skip descriptions I don't want to write at the moment, so I mark [write description of room - see PLOT #2.76.1-65] in the text. I also skip "scenes" because I'm eager to write another that's four chapters later.
c) How do you build your stories? I think them backwards. First I start with the most important part of the story (a catastrophe or that moment the story changes 180° degrees, or something mind-blowing is revealed) and then start wondering why that happened, or how did the characters arrived to that situation. I imagine the scene and then I wonder why I chose everything to be the way it is and make a series of questions about each of them, until I find an interesting question, so I answer it in another scene and so forth until the beginning. Then I tell the story in order, but that way I make sure there are no loopholes and the story stays interesting.
d) How much importance do you give to the creation of the characters' personality? I think of them as generic dolls and then start stuffing them with traits both inside and outside, I "customize" them until I like them. Then I draw them to see how they'd look together interacting, change their clothes, eye colour, etc, and when I'm satisfied, I start the story.
Okay, back to your question (I love the word "manifold", btw).
I don't have any topic like hope/despair that appears in all my novels. I think the only characteristic that they have in common is that they have a character that is obsessed with something and they think they have a crappy life (maybe I'm projecting).
One is about a dystopian world but moments before it becomes dystopian, because, when I started writing it, I thought there were too many novels in which the dystopian world was already settled and the authors let you know in two or three lines how the world we know became that way, which isn't interesting for me. I like the "why". Maybe that's another characteristic my novels have in common.
Most of the novels I wrote are more "domestic tragedies" than world-wide scenarios. There's another one about a diary of a guy that is obsessed with something and the entries have a peculiar order. Then another one of a guy that fakes his death, but that one I abandoned it because when I wrote the scene in which the friends find he's "committed suicide", I got sad because I had spent a lot of time "designing" him and now he was gone for half of what was left of the novel, haha. And another one about an actor and the resemblance/dissonance between his real life and the play he's in (I had to -sort of- write the play within the novel).