Mole
Permabanned
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2008
- Messages
- 20,282
Also, Victor seems to have a habit of avoiding arguments and spouting off almost relevant subjective expressions. It is important to note, that, should you be attempting to convince anyone of the legitimacy of your views, actual illustration and logical arguments are required. We cannot peek inside of your head to determine the data you have absorbed that leads you to your conclusions.
I do understand that the rhetorical device here is argumentation.
It is particularly inappropriate as this is not a peer review journal, nor a Court of Law or even Parliament.
Argumentation is used because is the cheapest and easiest device to hand.
But make no mistake - argumentation is simply rhetoric, or as you might call it - spin.
There are many rhetorical devices, some far more suitable than a constant diet of argumentation.
If rhetoric were diet, we would have vitamin deficiency.
But at a deeper level, argumentation is an obvious psychological defence.
And because it is used so naturally by all here, I can only assume you all belong to the same psycho-class.
But that is another question, answered by Lloyd Demause.