ENTJ.
Not going backwards, but the good ole days. As I said, it may be a strategic move on her part to distinguish herself.Earlier today I saw an ad. She was talking about getting things done, and not going backwards. I agree - ENTJ.
I am not sure how many watched the New Hampshire debates on Sunday, but Hillary’s entire message wreaked of how ITJs respond to change. Albeit may have been the only avenue available to distinguish herself from Obama and Edwards during the debate.How ENTJs Respond to Change-The first issue for them is to assess their own competence in the new arena. They tend to fight a change where no convincing rationale and no supporting data are presented. They want to see that the implications of the change have been thought through and that the proposed change will get to the real issues. They tend to respond to new data as it comes up and fit it into the way they’ve organized and structured their actions.
How INTJs Respond to Change-When dealing with change, the issue becomes one of how congruent the change is with their vision. They tend to be so strongly convinced of their vision and a sense of being right that they find it hard to see how they could have been wrong. When this is the case, they need to see incontrovertible evidence and well-grounded logic to re-conceptualize their vision and embrace the change.
How ISTJs Respond to Change-They face change cautiously. When the situation is unfamiliar, they first try to relate it to their previous experiences. Once they’ve made a decision, it is not easily changed unless it can be shown to be impractical and unworkable. Being able to describe the end product of the change in as much detail as possible helps them get on board with the change.
Hillary just does not look comfortable shooting from the hip. She seems quite deliberate with her thinking and her responses. During the debate one of the final questions asked what each would like to take back. Hillary gave a very careful and thought out answer. I think ENTJs would put it on the line as we saw with some of the other candidates.
How INTJs Respond to Change - When dealing with change, the issue becomes one of how congruent the change is with their vision. They tend to be so strongly convinced of their vision and a sense of being right that they find it hard to see how they could have been wrong. When this is the case, they need to see incontrovertible evidence and well-grounded logic to re-conceptualize their vision and embrace the change.
Sounds like Hillary to me.![]()
Would that not also be a sign that she prefers introversion to extraversion?Can anyone find me any reference to her being happy? Her childhood seems to be "read and write" not "meet people and enjoy life"... to such a degree that I would be surprised if her "E" traits are natural at all.
at some point she really seemed sincere in considering it laughable that experience could be trumped by those of lesser experience in the name of "Change". For that reason also again, I would not be too quick to dismiss ISTJ.
Would that not also be a sign that she prefers introversion to extraversion?
The failed attempt to write calligraphy may be a failed attempt to conform.Curious. I had a 'calligraphy phase', too. With respect to my handwriting now? I have been told I should have been a doctor.
Choking up at the thought of not getting to implement her ideas?
Font size in honor of Usehername:
She's INTJ!
![]()
For those who don't know what I'm talking about, here's the clip.
So if Hilary Clinton becomes President, would that make Bill Clinton the first lady?
First Dick.
That is short for William, right? I always second-guess these things.
Dick is short for Richard.
Bill is short for William.
Jack is short for John, despite both names having four letters.
But hey, let's go with First Bill...that'll work.
So if Hilary Clinton becomes President, would that make Bill Clinton the first lady?