1 + 2 = 3
2 + 4 = 6
Do not look at the sequence.
Look at the loci
123
246
369
wildcat said:Sorry.
I did not want to disrupt your thread.
You were away, doing God knows what.
It is your thread.
Get on with it.
There is a innate difference in the process applied!
Dichotomy is one process only.
Everything takes place simultaneously.
In a dichotomy.
Preference is already.
There is no before or after.
Differentiation is another process altogether.
In other words, girls are not dolls.
Girls may have dolls, though.
Differentiation is what does not add in a dichotomy.
It is called inclusion.
This is all what I wanted to say.
1 + 2 = 3
2 + 4 = 6
Do not look at the sequence.
Look at the loci
123
246
369
Yes! And exactly.Comparing posts here because I noticed a parallel.
Interesting, because the interpretation has led me to beleive that parallels are what we're speaking of here as well.
Te and Ti are almost the same- just as the equations 1+2=3 and 2+4=6 are- a number plus its double. The numbers even make a lovely little overlaping pattern if arranged, so that the same numbers cross the top and the left-hand side.
However, the numbers AREN'T the same- they are parallel equations as opposed to identical equations, just as some functions are almost identical, but in the end just run parallel to thier introverted/extroverted counterpart.
They are distinct, and in most manners they are the same. The same thing can be said about a lot of things. After all, what are dolls but minature, lifeless girls?![]()
Interesting math, aelan and Kuranes.
Gives me something to think about in the rainy, endless nites.
[COLOR="Black"] 1[/COLOR][COLOR="Sienna"] 2[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkOliveGreen"] 3[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkGreen"] 6[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkSlateBlue"] 12[/COLOR][COLOR="Navy"] 24[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Sienna"] 2[/COLOR][COLOR="Olive"] 4[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkGreen"] 6[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkSlateBlue"] 12[/COLOR][COLOR="Navy"] 24[/COLOR][COLOR="Indigo"] 48[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DarkOliveGreen"] 3[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkGreen"] 6[/COLOR][COLOR="Teal"] 9[/COLOR][COLOR="RoyalBlue"] 18[/COLOR][COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"] 36[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleTurquoise"] 72[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DarkGreen"] 6[/COLOR][COLOR="DarkSlateBlue"] 12[/COLOR][COLOR="RoyalBlue"] 18[/COLOR][COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"] 36[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleTurquoise"] 72[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleGreen"] 144[/COLOR]
[COLOR="DarkSlateBlue"] 12[/COLOR][COLOR="Navy"] 24[/COLOR][COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"] 36[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleTurquoise"] 72[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleGreen"] 144[/COLOR][COLOR="Lime"] 288[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Navy"] 24[/COLOR][COLOR="Indigo"] 48[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleTurquoise"] 72[/COLOR][COLOR="PaleGreen"] 144[/COLOR][COLOR="Lime"] 288[/COLOR][COLOR="SeaGreen"] 576[/COLOR]
I showed an example of it going past 90 in my post, but you have to take an extra step once you get into double digits, just as doubling of the digits is itself an extra step.1*9=9 --> 0+9=9
2*9=18 --> 1+8=9
3*9=27 --> 2+7=9
4*9=36 --> 3+6=9
5*9=45 --> 4+5=9
...
Meh, that only works up to 90 --> 9+0=9.
Hmmm. Interesting claim. I think I agree with it. Of course they are not mutually exclusive. I can have "symmetry of numbers" also.Symmetry is more interesting than numbers.
I showed an example of it going past 90 in my post, but you have to take an extra step once you get into double digits, just as doubling of the digits is itself an extra step.
Hmmm. Interesting claim. I think I agree with it. Of course they are not mutually exclusive. I can have "symmetry of numbers" also.