Quick
Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2018
- Messages
- 315
- MBTI Type
- INFP
This is completely irrelevant to our discussion. It began with a simple question which you've avoided and when expressed why you're avoiding answering it, you give two different reasons of which neither is valid, relative to many possibilities premised on your own 'choice' premise.
Let's lay this out clearly and simply. You've oversimplified 'choice' and 'belief'. If one believes something, they may not have a choice to believe such because of both context and limitations in abilities. But they also might have a choice and an accurate belief, within the right context and considering their abilities.
Not everyone who wants to become president, becomes the president, regardless of their choices. There are thousands of politicians who haven't attained the position, even though they believe they should be the president and have made the right choices to work themselves to that level. Some can't because they can't handle stress where neuroticism isn't a choice. They also can't believe themselves out of neuroticism.
I'm not sure I see how this has anything to do with what I said.
You did NOT ask a fair question, obviously. Fact.
Even if we assume it IS a fair question, then I can answer the question how I want to.
If you mean to "prove" by asking a question in which there is ONLY one correct answer that there is no such thing as choice, then I expect you to answer my question as well.
I will repeat my question.
Do you act like you don't have a choice?