A Very Accurate Socionics Test.

[MisterNi]

I don't relate to socionics as much as I do to and I also barely relate to . I am 100% unquestionably Beta, that much I know. While I can see both myself equally in SLE and EIE in type descriptions (and I have read many) and their function stacking, SLE is more fitting for me. Not by much, but it still goes over the edge.

Further, MBTI and socionics do not have to align.

Also, to the bold , how would you know work is difficult on me? I enjoy working, and part of the reason for any difficulty I have is due to picking a very difficult career track.

Of course a working professional who is Beta or Gamma would prefer the description of within the workplace. is the ego's source of force and power and in some cases the enforcer of rigid policies. You are an EIE type who must set it aside and play with your role, but you are not an SLE. Leave that to the professional ego types.

No the type systems don't always align, especially if it's due to politics and power brokering.

Good for you, I have as well.

 

[Verona]

EIE type and an ENFJ in MBTI. Your dual is LSI/ISTj and likely an ISTJ or ISTP in MBTI; possibly also typing as INTP or even INTJ in MBTI.

Interesting. I tend to relate to the SEI descriptions on sociotype but I will look into EIE

 

[Masokissed]

SLE type; ESTP in MBTI. Your dual is IEI/INFp type and will likely type INFJ or possibly INTJ or INFP or even INTP and sometimes ISFJ or ISFP in MBTI. Your dual is a mess under the MBTI sorter.

This is funny to me, because on 16types you said I was IEI by my pictures.

Hopefully that's a hint to you of who I am. Unless you're the kind of IEE with the memory and scatteredness of a fly.

 

[hjgbujhghg]

This is funny to me, because on 16types you said I was IEI by my pictures.

Hopefully that's a hint to you of who I am. Unless you're the kind of IEE with the memory and scatteredness of a fly.

lol...and this is how online typing works

 

[MisterNi]

If I try to calculate it myself I'll fuck it up, so do it for me?

A: 5
B: 9
C: 4
D: 11
E: 9
F: 6
G: 12
H: 19

It seems that you are a lazy IEE type and whatever MBTI type you want to be. Your dual would be a non-lazy SLI type and she most likely types as an ISTP and identifies strongly as an SP in the MBTI sorter. Do your own conclusion in the future; I won't always be around to tell you the answer in a reasonable amount of time.

 

[á´…eparted]

Of course a working professional who is Beta or Gamma would prefer the description of within the workplace. is the ego's source of force and power and in some cases the enforcer of rigid policies. You are an EIE type who must set it aside and play with your role, but you are not an SLE. Leave that to the professional ego types.

No the type systems don't always align, especially if it's due to politics and power brokering.

Good for you, I have as well.

No. I find it to be very unusual that you gleamed EIE from my "results" anyway, as that would have been quite low in the list of guesses. I question your judgement based on that alone. Further, you do not know me, my inner working, and have very little interaction with me to use as any external basis.

Sorry, but you do not get to tell me what my type is. I did not ask for your interpretation, and I have pointed out that you are incorrect. It is not worth my time to try and prove you wrong when you have illustrated that you aren't using an accurate basis for interpretation. As such I ask that you drop this, accept that you do not know a person better than know themselves, and in the future resist the temptation to tell others their typing is wrong with no basis or reasoning to do so, as it is very unbecoming, inappropriate, and almost always factually incorrect when done in the manner in which you are doing.

I also find your responses to others to be rude patronizing and insulting. Calling people lazy (among other things), when they didn't even ask for interpreation is uncalled for, and I suggest you quit while you're ahead.

 

[Norrsken]

Well, that might have been very recently in the past and you're doing well now.

Perhaps. I used to be extremely unhealthy, that's for sure. Maybe when I took the quiz, I kind of picked answers that I used to remember thinking or doing that wasn't healthy from a psychological standpoint.

 

[MisterNi]

Interesting. I tend to relate to the SEI descriptions on sociotype but I will look into EIE

You probably have SEI people in your life whom you admire for their guidance but you are indeed an EIE type.

 

[MisterNi]

This is funny to me, because on 16types you said I was IEI by my pictures.

Hopefully that's a hint to you of who I am. Unless you're the kind of IEE with the memory and scatteredness of a fly.

Your parents must be duals then. My youngest daughter looks like a perfect combination of my wife and I. She has the same tongue as me though.

I will say you are a dualized Beta perceiver then and leave it at that until I have more information and details about who you are as a person.

- - - Updated - - -

lol...and this is how online typing works

I'm eventually 100% accurate, stop judging me too early.

Also, who are you trying to fool? You're an ILE or ENTP in MBTI. Lol.

 

[Yama]

It seems that you are a lazy IEE type and whatever MBTI type you want to be. Your dual would be a non-lazy SLI type and she most likely types as an ISTP and identifies strongly as an SP in the MBTI sorter. Do your own conclusion in the future; I won't always be around to tell you the answer in a reasonable amount of time.

I find it very interesting that you're getting IEE from this despite Ne being so low on the list; curious as to how you think someone who doesn't value a function that drastically could possibly have it as a dominant function? Am I allowed to ask how you decided that?

 

[Norrsken]

I'm sensing a shit storm. *opens umbrella*

 

[MisterNi]

No. I find it to be very unusual that you gleamed EIE from my "results" anyway, as that would have been quite low in the list of guesses. I question your judgement based on that alone. Further, you do not know me, my inner working, and have very little interaction with me to use as any external basis.

Sorry, but you do not get to tell me what my type is. I did not ask for your interpretation, and I have pointed out that you are incorrect. It is not worth my time to try and prove you wrong when you have illustrated that you aren't using an accurate basis for interpretation. As such I ask that you drop this, accept that you do not know a person better than know themselves, and in the future resist the temptation to tell others their typing is wrong with no basis or reasoning to do so, as it is very unbecoming, inappropriate, and almost always factually incorrect when done in the manner in which you are doing.

I also find your responses to others to be rude patronizing and insulting. Calling people lazy (among other things), when they didn't even ask for interpreation is uncalled for, and I suggest you quit while you're ahead.

Good Lord. My mistake; you are an type and an ESE; your MBTI type is ESFJ but you stubbornly refuse to admit that due to discrimination and stubbornly type as ENFJ in MBTI. Looking at your userCP and signature make me want to facepalm though . Your dual is ILI type and would likely test as an INTP or sometimes ISTJ but rarely ISTP.

 

[MisterNi]

I find it very interesting that you're getting IEE from this despite Ne being so low on the list; curious as to how you think someone who doesn't value a function that drastically could possibly have it as a dominant function? Am I allowed to ask how you decided that?

I got reached that conclusion from the Meta. You should try accessing it one of these days.

 

[MisterNi]

I'm sensing a shit storm. *opens umbrella*

Hm, okay; I will not be caught unawares. Thank you for providing an early warning; maybe you should make a system out of your mind.

 

[hjgbujhghg]

[MENTION=4175]MisterNi[/MENTION]

ILE? ENTP? Now... I am just really curious how did you come to this conclusion?

 

[Norrsken]

maybe you should make a system out of your mind.

Come again?

 

[MisterNi]

[MENTION=4175]MisterNi[/MENTION]

ILE? ENTP? Now... I am just really curious how did you come to this conclusion?

Just because you really like SLE guys doesn't mean you're still not an ILE. I came to that conclusion because I remember who you are as a person and through the use of Creative .

 

[á´…eparted]

Good Lord. My mistake; you are an type and an ESE; your MBTI type is ESFJ but you stubbornly refuse to admit that due to discrimination and stubbornly type as ENFJ in MBTI. Looking at your userCP and signature make me want to facepalm though . Your dual is ILI type and would likely test as an INTP or sometimes ISTJ but rarely ISTP.

You clearly and flagrently ignored what I just stated, so I will repeat:

Sorry, but you do not get to tell me what my type is. ... As such I ask that you drop this

Continue to do so and I will regard it as harassment. I am happy to discuss other things (namely- the fact that you're proclaiming wild conclusions with little rational basis or foundation), but my type is not up for discussion here.

But please, by all means do continue to proclaim that you know someone better than they know themselves, while you know absolutely nothing about the other person at all. You'll quickly build a reputation around here, that's for sure.

 

[MisterNi]

Come again?

That would be a good engagement of your and you'd be able to produce something of value to people who depend on you.

 

[Smilephantomhive]

I got reached that conclusion from the Meta. You should try accessing it one of these days.

What exactly is "the Meta???"