Well, my pattern actually doesn't correspond to type at all. Look, according to this
test, my functional preferences don't make any sense at all. The order was:
Ti -- 41.1 (excellent use)
Si -- 40.4 (excellent use)
Fi -- 39.2 (excellent use)
Ne -- 37.5 (excellent use)
Fe -- 36.6 (excellent use)
Ni -- 32.1 (good use)
Te -- 9.9 (unused)
Se -- 2.8 (unused)
I retook the test today, and got these results. I'm off the wall, aren't I?
Fi -- 42.5 (excellent use)
Fe -- 41 (excellent use)
Si -- 36.6 (excellent use)
Ti -- 34.2 (good use)
Ni -- 31.6 (good use)
Ne -- 21.5 (limited use)
Te -- 20.2 (limited use)
Se -- 12.2 (unused)
According to this, no type fits. For instance, the first type you would think of after looking at this would be ISTP, but where's the Se? Then maybe ISTJ, but then there's not enough Te. My theoretical dominant and auxiliaries are my weakest functions except for Te and Se. The closest type patterns that make sense are INFP, INTP, and ISFJ. I rarely use Ne, as far as I can tell.
Ti as
my strongest function? I'm sure there are several ISTP's and INTP's who would be quick to scoff at such an idea. Just read a few of my past posts. I suppose this test (or my understanding of the questions) must be flawed, because the functional development they're proposing is impossible from the standpoint of pure Jungian theory, Socionic theory, and the MBTI. That would be three against one, right? And it would seem absurd for someone to have five functions with excellent development, wouldn't it?
Well, according to something I read somewhere, the last functions to develop should be the opposite of your dominant and auxiliary. If Se is weakest, then Ni would be dominant (normal). If Te is second-weakest, Fi should be auxiliary (this is an abberation, but Fi is counted as strong). Si and Ti actually test as my strongest functions, but that doesn't seem to make much sense.
Of course, if that is the case, that five of my functions are that strong, then I suppose that could undermine Jungian theory, and invalidate the purpose of all the existing material and theories that have been founded upon it. If that's really a possible outcome, perhaps we should just ignore this test.