I think Mac's theory is half-right. I do see a bit of Fe vs. Fi here. Actually a lot. But it's not just his theories or posting style, or even the thread interruptions that upset people. If he started those threads and then interacted with those who challenged his ideas, his posting style would be fine. Annoying sometimes, but fine. It's the fact that every thread started by Victor turns into the same accusations of bullying, the same accusations of people not understanding, or being afraid to confront his ideas, the same accusations of turning against the prophet when he says something the masses don't want to hear, since they are so enamored of their current brainwashing by MBTI, the same portrayal of himself as a lone voice of reason in a sea of cruel and ignorant haters, etc., etc. THAT is why I have him on ignore. I've seen that show too many times, so 1) it's boring for me to watch over and over again, and 2) it drives me NUTS to watch someone experience the same phenomenon over and over and complain about it without altering his behavior in the slightest, to even SEE if he would get a different result. It drives me nuts to listen to a friend complain about being victimized without changing anything, and it drives me nuts when Victor does it.
[MENTION=4109]entropie[/MENTION], I don't think anyone who is complaining about Victor's tactics lacks the intelligence to understand his ideas. Some of them are interesting; others are half-baked at best. They are, in essence, only conversation starters. But he's so in love with them as-is that he doesn't want to let the world sully them by having an actual conversation about them. There are interesting conversations to be had that could be sparked by his theories about MBTI or makeup or whatever, but he's not willing to open his mind to the possibility of amending them. The rest of the world understands that our theories are constantly being amended as new perspectives are added, perspectives we haven't thought about as we sit alone in our rooms. Victor seems to see these other perspectives as an attack on his pristine idea. To me, that renders a lot of his ideas fairly useless. He doesn't acknowledge, as would the rest of us, that there's room for error, and it doesn't mean the person who pointed it out is a fearful bully. You seem to be reacting to him the way he reacts to himself--do you really believe that people are reacting to him the way they do out of fear?