Venom
Babylon Candle
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 2,126
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 1w9
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
Ive noticed that the typing of ourselves can seemingly change with regards to where we are on the self actualization chart http://www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/04/levels-of-consciousness
That's just an example chart, and yes it's somewhat Ni biased, but you get the idea.
It's very EASY to type myself when I only type the version of me when I'm the highest up the actualization levels. It only becomes difficult when I try to come up with a type that takes all the levels of myself into account. Perhaps we should take this into account when typing ourselves? maybe the frequency that you act a certain way really is unimportant if instead it's how you act when you are most actualized (ie you are living life in a way that is so congruent wi yourself that the real you can't help but shine on the world... Ie totally opposite of the stress filled lives that don't the real selves that so many of us choose)
That's just an example chart, and yes it's somewhat Ni biased, but you get the idea.
It's very EASY to type myself when I only type the version of me when I'm the highest up the actualization levels. It only becomes difficult when I try to come up with a type that takes all the levels of myself into account. Perhaps we should take this into account when typing ourselves? maybe the frequency that you act a certain way really is unimportant if instead it's how you act when you are most actualized (ie you are living life in a way that is so congruent wi yourself that the real you can't help but shine on the world... Ie totally opposite of the stress filled lives that don't the real selves that so many of us choose)