You continue to prove yourself mentally deficient, by your own words.
Umm...
Were you trying to prove my point, or did that just happen by accident?
My whole point is that MBTI can't be a "false notion" because it's not a notion at all. It's simply a frame of reference, an arbitrary method of organizing data: it can't be
right or
wrong because it isn't a statement of deductive reasoning.
It's simply, "I choose to arbitrarily place people who act this way into this made up category."
Nevermind, you weren't trying to prove my point, you're just waaaay behind.
EDIT: An explanation is probably necessary here.
We can observe the following simply by watching people:
--People exhibit certain behaviors under certain conditions
--Different people are more prone to certain behaviors under certain conditions than others
--If we watch people, we can make somewhat useful inferences about the way they will probably tend to behave, though we cannot predict exactly what they will do at any given time.
If you can explain some reason this is not true, I'd love to hear it.
From there, it's all arbitrary categorizing and labeling. The very definitions of the types are themselves subjective because MBTI doesn't purport to be scientific. Isn't it obvious from reading the "type analysis" posts on this board? Or don't you actually read any of the posts/make any attempt to grasp the methodology being used?
There's this whole little group of you that runs around parroting the same garbage about judging whether MBTI is "true" or "false" as if it's one singular idea with inherent, measurable truth or falsehood. That's SO missing the point. Please, please read this:
Don't they teach this shit in freshman year of college anymore?
Inductive arguments fundamentally can't be evaluated in terms of absolute truth value, because they don't suggest positive or absolute truths: only
probabilities about what may happen next, based on observing past trends.
If you understand the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning, you will see why MBTI isn't judged in terms of truth or falsehood. It's neither
objective nor
quantifiable.
I'm sorry, that's probably too many big words for an ESTP. You should just beat me with a chair to prove how wrong I am.