Anything that differs from your personal belief system is a no for you. lol.
"Boom, headshot"? Sounds like the lexicon of a forum troll. Wait, didn't they ban you from another forum? I forget.
Let's break down why the link you provided is questionable - we'll skip over the fact that it is irrelevant in the first instance because I have already redacted "tidiness" from the literal aspects that make a J type a J type because that exact and specific word is not on the official MBTI and people tend to have a very difficult time with connecting the dots between what is actual (orderliness and organisation on the official MBTI) and what is an obvious byproduct of the aforementioned characteristics (tidiness - clearly a byproduct of being organised and orderly). So the intent is questionable - you have provided a link regarding the messiness of INTJs, but why? It is surely not related to cleaning dust, that is cleanliness, which is obviously has a different meaning than tidiness (being tidy does not mean you are clean nor vica versa).
Now that the intent has been questioned - we move on. What is the website? A blog page for some introverts. Not a scientific journal or anything credible. Move on again, who is the author? The biography says they basically write about a couple of things and says nothing of any qualifications regarding MBTI, no books written about personality theory, so to me they're not exactly a credible source.
Move on again - the poll itself. It was created for a "success-minded INTJ" Facebook group - okay, so who says these INTJs in the group are INTJs? Each and every individual in that group needs to be questioned before we can actually determine that the respondents to this poll are actually INTJs in the first place. The poll asked respondents (that we can not be sure are INTJs) to select between the following options:
- I keep my spaces organized and tidy, or
- I allow untidiness and my spaces may look messy.
A quick look at what I posted earlier - which is literally taken from the official MBTI test - will clarify beyond reasonable doubt that the first option is the J option via dichotomy (pertaining to being organised) and the second option is absolutely and unequivocally pertaining to MBTIs P dichotomy - which is disorganised (as opposed to Js organised preference).
This
obviously means we should question the
J-ness of 46 of the 55 participants. The author provides some lazy arguments to explain why so many INTJ types would select what is obviously a P preference but this is just nonsense rationalisation to make an clear P selection via MBTI look like it's J, when it isn't.
I was permanently banned from PersonalityCafe without warning, correct, and without a valid reason - the argument was essentially that a few people didn't like me, and the administrator at the time sent me an e-mail to the effect of "I'm the boss and what I say goes" when I attempted to rebut my permanent ban (without warning) on the grounds that I was not warned of an imminent permanent ban. The administration then was extremely dubious, I understand it has since changed hands (hopefully for the better).
"Boom"? Headshot"? Alright, first I wasn't sure you were a kid, or maybe a kid with perhaps autism, but now for a fact I know you are a kid.Last post about this and no more. Furthermore, you are quite rude. Goodbye, then.
Focus on what you're able to comprehend instead of the point - nice. The fact remains that if you were to scour my post history, you will find no N elitism, no looking down on S types, no questioning of every other N type and suggesting they are S types - this instance is isolated and confined to this thread and the information found within it exclusively, which does indeed suggest a stronger preference for S over N for the OP - for which I provided my reasoning for earlier in the thread.